GopherWeatherGuy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2013
- Messages
- 16,717
- Reaction score
- 16,391
- Points
- 113
I'm with you.
I think Nebraska stands alone in their disadvantaged status. They've never won an NCAA game. Fred was very successful at ISU and can't seem to get any traction there. Northwestern had historically been the program that couldn't seem to get anywhere, but Collins has flipped the script there...although could it fly on its own there without him? Penn State has some disadvantages (e.g., out in the middle of nowhere, although that hasn't seemed to affect the football program), and they've been taking two steps forward and one step back over and over since they joined the conference.
Minnesota has both advantages and disadvantages. There's been too many successes over the years to characterize this as a bad situation, but sustained success isn't automatic either. We're disadvantaged at the moment because of the last quarter century of underperforming the situation, but I see our potential as being no worse than Wisconsin or Iowa.
I'll disagree with you on Nebraska. There's no reason they shouldn't be successful. Fred is a very overrated coach. They have great facilities and plenty of money to spend. Location isn't a big issue considering there are 3 highly successful programs within a 3 hr drive.