I think this is completely fair other than the fans getting impatient, though I'd say we do expect the worst. People were patient with Monson and Pitino to a fault. The coaches seemed to all agree that this was the 6th to 8th best job in the conference. That puts us behind Michigan, Michigan State, Indiana, Illinois, Maryland, and then somewhere in with Purdue/Wisconsin/Minnesota depending on which of the anonymous coaches voice you choose to hear. I don't think anyone argues that. Consistently finishing behind Wisconsin is a problem and will alway be with the fan base. Now we're finishing behind Iowa, Rutgers, and Penn State the past couple years which is completely unacceptable. To defend the fan base this has been a school that's been in or around the top 25 in average attendance for a lot of these years where the program has been down. I think the support is good for such a poor product, but the average age of those willing to still support is certainly a concern.
The Barn is certainly an issue and the coaches are completely right with how you frame it. If we were winning a lot, there would be a charm to it. Because we've been losing, it's just old. I've heard from multiple people through various coaching staffs that the Barn looks really bad when it's empty (no game going on for a visit from a recruit for a walkthrough or whatever). It doesn't surprise me that it's considered arguably the biggest negative with the job.