Bob_Loblaw
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2009
- Messages
- 21,216
- Reaction score
- 17,286
- Points
- 113
First of all the headline and lead sentence are phrased that Sam is a suspect in an assualt, and ties him as another athlete in trouble with the law. The second sentence reveals Sam admits he was a witness. And when you get to the police report on the "victim" it is sceptical at best. A cut over the eye that needed a couple stitches. The problem, the press who trumpet the First Amemdment seem to stop their reading right there. They either have no interest, once their rights are insured. Their cavalier disdain for the 5th and 14th Amendment needs someone to cram it to them. Were does a individual right to due process meet the right to a free press? Is the presumption of innocence invalid when it comes to the right to publish?
In many cases and stories they choose to not reveal the names or description of assailants. But when it suits them......
Shame on you WCCO. Don't ever tell me about your rights, until you honor all the rights enumerated.
Not to be rude, but WTF are you talking about? You think that WCCO is obligated by the 5th and 14th Amendments?
I agree with you that it could be considered sketchy reporting, but but bringing up Due Process is laughable.