Run Game


I don't fully understand the running game like I would like to.

Still seemed like we caught Penn St. often enough that the run game worked.
 

I don't fully understand the running game like I would like to.

Still seemed like we caught Penn St. often enough that the run game worked.
Our run game, vs. Mason's run game (for example) essentially gives the defense an extra second to react.

Would be different if we had a QB run threat,
 

I dunno, I give the game plan today and the execution a high grade as they moved the ball on the ground and in the air against a top 10 defense in the country. The offensive line played much better today.
 

I dunno, I give the game plan today and the execution a high grade as they moved the ball on the ground and in the air against a top 10 defense in the country. The offensive line played much better today.
We have an amazing RB, and 80% of his carries are with 5 guys all over him.
 


Our run game, vs. Mason's run game (for example) essentially gives the defense an extra second to react.

Would be different if we had a QB run threat,
Mason had outstanding OLs at times but he wasn't a run game genius or anything...
 
Last edited:

Just watched the first half on the VCR and our running was better than it seemed in person. I think when Tailor gets holed up for a 1 or 2 yard loss just stuck in my mind like Rutgers but that was not the case. Will have to watch the second half tomorrow and see if my thinking changes.

Anywho, that was a very entertaining half of football on all sides, counting PSU too. The commentators certainly were enjoying themselves. Nice to see Minnesota as part of that level of play with the recognition.
 


Just watched the first half on the VCR and our running was better than it seemed in person. I think when Tailor gets holed up for a 1 or 2 yard loss just stuck in my mind like Rutgers but that was not the case. Will have to watch the second half tomorrow and see if my thinking changes.

Anywho, that was a very entertaining half of football on all sides, counting PSU too. The commentators certainly were enjoying themselves. Nice to see Minnesota as part of that level of play with the recognition.
Yeah it was a pretty high quality game
Not very big ten west in terms of entertainment level
 










We run a lot of compact formations. Even our WR are not split as wide as they could be. However yesterday we weren’t going to win in the screen and quick pass game.

Every week is a different battle and matchup.
 

Leidner overall had better passing stats (other than INTs)and was way more productive as a runner.
They have almost identical completion percentage but Leidner was a much better runner.
 

They have almost identical completion percentage but Leidner was a much better runner.
I don't recall the AAK days very well due to my youth and inattention to things beyond the score of the game but did AAK pummel himself against defenders the way Leidner did? Mitch was an absolute gamer. He gets a lot of criticism from some and he threw the lamest of ducks on occasion, but man, he left it all out there.
 

I don't recall the AAK days very well due to my youth and inattention to things beyond the score of the game but did AAK pummel himself against defenders the way Leidner did? Mitch was an absolute gamer. He gets a lot of criticism from some and he threw the lamest of ducks on occasion, but man, he left it all out there.
He also probably would have had more prolific running stats if not for foot injuries.
 

The slow delayed hand off has aged like mold. Our OL is blown up by the time our RB gets the ball and starts forward. Can we just get a quick hitter, let them hit the hole with some momentum instead of flat footed?
Totally agree, it has worked in the past but not this year at all. Seems like Taylor is missing a little something as well, not breaking that tackle that he needs for the big play.
 

He also probably would have had more prolific running stats if not for foot injuries.
I remember that xray image of his foot before he got surgery prior to his senior season. He was running on that withered thing and running well lol
 

He's 4th behind Morgan, Brosmer, and Cupito in career passer rating.
Right, so he was a pretty good passer if he’s 4th all time. I didn’t imply that he was better than those who came after him, just that there is/was often a perception that QBs tagged as “dual threat,” are not thought of as strong passers. He is right up there with all those guys. And if sports-reference.com is accurate 😄 AAK has the second highest passer rating in history.
 

We run a lot of compact formations. Even our WR are not split as wide as they could be. However yesterday we weren’t going to win in the screen and quick pass game.

Every week is a different battle and matchup.
Hmm, maybe in the first several games. Saw a lot of spread out formations in the last 5-6 games for sure.
 

I don't recall the AAK days very well due to my youth and inattention to things beyond the score of the game but did AAK pummel himself against defenders the way Leidner did? Mitch was an absolute gamer. He gets a lot of criticism from some and he threw the lamest of ducks on occasion, but man, he left it all out there.
AAK was a much better quarterback than Leidner.
 

The slow delayed hand off has aged like mold. Our OL is blown up by the time our RB gets the ball and starts forward. Can we just get a quick hitter, let them hit the hole with some momentum instead of flat footed?
Brosmer under center and quick hitters. I don't like Dariius eight yards behind the line of scrimmage.
 

They have almost identical completion percentage but Leidner was a much better runner.
Was Leinster much better? I don’t recall them dialing AAK’s # in the run game a whole lot, but he had wheels. I wonder how he would have faired in a spread option.
 




Top Bottom