Can be found here: http://www.1500espn.com/sportswire/gophers (In the Coach's shows section to the right)
I should have done a recap of this when listening to it as it was well worth it for most Gopher fans who visit this board.
Some things I remember off the top of my head (almost surely not in the order they were discussed on the show)
Challenge of practice without Daquein McNeil- Pitino talked about the difficulty of getting any flow to practice when he constantly now has to move players to different positions during practice (mentioned stopping an installation or a scrimmage and moving Joey to the 3(!) and Bakary to the 4).
A new walk on?- Pitino mentioned that they would probably look to add someone once they got back from the Wake Forest game. I didn't get the vibe from his answer to the question (a general, will you try to add a player?) that he had a particular guy in mind. He seems genuinely concerned about both numbers of bodies and style of play post McNeil.
"Uncle Bob". In one of the funnier moments of the interview Pitino talked about going over the film with the team and how often Bobby Knight mentioned Elliott Eliason's name (both Phil Mackey and Pitino surmised that it was because it was one of the players names Coach Knight knew). So Pitino asked Eliason is that your Uncle or something, why is he always saying your name? So according to Pitino it's "Uncle Bob" during film session. This wasn't a shot at Knight for the Bobby Knight fans on the board as Coach Pitino had nice things to say about Coach Knight though acknowledging that they've never really met.
Criticism from outside sources: Another interesting nugget that came up during film review is that Pitino will sometimes leave in the analysts comments so that players hear that it's not just their coach/coaches that think something was a bad play. An example was used of Knight (or Dakich) saying Carlos Morris took a bad shot and Coach Pitino left the commentary in there so the team heard it.
Assistant most likely to become a head coach? Question from Phil Mackey and Pitino said Dan McHale, but then also said that he thought all three assistants would eventually be head guys and that Dan is just further along experience wise so he's the closest to being ready for the shot. It was more interesting to hear Richard answer how a coach can show he's ready for a head job and his answer was recruiting. Richard said he got jobs because of the players they got at Louisville and then said that behind an unsuccessful coach is almost always a staff who has failed him by not bringing in players. He says that we're not on a level (YET) of UNC, Kentucky, or Kansas and that it's not just about bringing in 5 star guys but finding the best guys you can bring in to fit your system (mentions not all 5 star guys would fit his system) and cites Kimani Young bringing in Nate Mason as an example of a guy who was underrated but looks like he's going to be a very good player.
Andre Hollins struggles: Coach said he met with Andre after the NIT and asked him during all his struggles, did he (Pitino) ever play him less? Hollins answered "No" and then Pitino said that as long as he has confidence in him, that Hollins should ignore other voices. Also praised his Andres defense.
Charles Buggs: Pitino specficially mentioned fans wanting him to play Charles Buggs more. This was interesting because he specifically mentioned that Charles was making defensive mistakes (and it was implied over and over again) and he just can't leave a guy on the court who is doing that.
Anyways its worth a listen if you have the time.
I should have done a recap of this when listening to it as it was well worth it for most Gopher fans who visit this board.
Some things I remember off the top of my head (almost surely not in the order they were discussed on the show)
Challenge of practice without Daquein McNeil- Pitino talked about the difficulty of getting any flow to practice when he constantly now has to move players to different positions during practice (mentioned stopping an installation or a scrimmage and moving Joey to the 3(!) and Bakary to the 4).
A new walk on?- Pitino mentioned that they would probably look to add someone once they got back from the Wake Forest game. I didn't get the vibe from his answer to the question (a general, will you try to add a player?) that he had a particular guy in mind. He seems genuinely concerned about both numbers of bodies and style of play post McNeil.
"Uncle Bob". In one of the funnier moments of the interview Pitino talked about going over the film with the team and how often Bobby Knight mentioned Elliott Eliason's name (both Phil Mackey and Pitino surmised that it was because it was one of the players names Coach Knight knew). So Pitino asked Eliason is that your Uncle or something, why is he always saying your name? So according to Pitino it's "Uncle Bob" during film session. This wasn't a shot at Knight for the Bobby Knight fans on the board as Coach Pitino had nice things to say about Coach Knight though acknowledging that they've never really met.
Criticism from outside sources: Another interesting nugget that came up during film review is that Pitino will sometimes leave in the analysts comments so that players hear that it's not just their coach/coaches that think something was a bad play. An example was used of Knight (or Dakich) saying Carlos Morris took a bad shot and Coach Pitino left the commentary in there so the team heard it.
Assistant most likely to become a head coach? Question from Phil Mackey and Pitino said Dan McHale, but then also said that he thought all three assistants would eventually be head guys and that Dan is just further along experience wise so he's the closest to being ready for the shot. It was more interesting to hear Richard answer how a coach can show he's ready for a head job and his answer was recruiting. Richard said he got jobs because of the players they got at Louisville and then said that behind an unsuccessful coach is almost always a staff who has failed him by not bringing in players. He says that we're not on a level (YET) of UNC, Kentucky, or Kansas and that it's not just about bringing in 5 star guys but finding the best guys you can bring in to fit your system (mentions not all 5 star guys would fit his system) and cites Kimani Young bringing in Nate Mason as an example of a guy who was underrated but looks like he's going to be a very good player.
Andre Hollins struggles: Coach said he met with Andre after the NIT and asked him during all his struggles, did he (Pitino) ever play him less? Hollins answered "No" and then Pitino said that as long as he has confidence in him, that Hollins should ignore other voices. Also praised his Andres defense.
Charles Buggs: Pitino specficially mentioned fans wanting him to play Charles Buggs more. This was interesting because he specifically mentioned that Charles was making defensive mistakes (and it was implied over and over again) and he just can't leave a guy on the court who is doing that.
Anyways its worth a listen if you have the time.