BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 64,680
- Reaction score
- 24,122
- Points
- 113
Go Gophers!!
I don’t know there seems to be a pretty strong correlation in the dataGood example of what a crapshoot recruiting really is
thewalkonredshirts.com
How many years is this for? I have Georgia's winning % at 80.25 over the last 10 years.Here's a little more detailed look at the same phenomenon.
![]()
Recruiting Class Ranking vs Teams’ Performance - The Walk-On Redshirts
We’re in the thick of the offseason, so naturally my mind is wondering about some of the intricacies of college football. One idea that was sparked after seeing a post about how great Miami’s recruiting classes have been in the past 5 years – why brag on how good your recruiting classes are if...thewalkonredshirts.com
![]()
Not sure but it may be a couple years old.How many years is this for? I have Georgia's winning % at 80.25 over the last 10 years.
Right, it clearly shows it makes a massive correlation at the top and bottom, things are muddled in the middle as expected.I don’t know there seems to be a pretty strong correlation in the data
Of course there will be some variance, if there wasn’t, no one would watch
Agree. Its a little unclear if recruiting predicts winning or if winning predicts recruiting.Right, it clearly shows it makes a massive correlation at the top and bottom, things are muddled in the middle as expected.
The answer is probably, yesAgree. Its a little unclear if recruiting predicts winning or if winning predicts recruiting.
Yea, I think it's a bit old, I have Oregon at 76% over the last 10 years.Not sure but it may be a couple years old.