GopherWeatherGuy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2013
- Messages
- 16,861
- Reaction score
- 16,576
- Points
- 113
I'm not advocating for it, nor have I called playing this fall evil or stupid. I am simply explaining why, having decided not to play this fall, they are attracted to the idea of playing in the spring.
I'm not weighing in on the political debate of whether they should play or not, but even if the virus magically disappears as has been predicted, there is no assurance that football or life in general will return to normal by next year. The schools are planning for reduced attendance and revenue going forward. Will that prove to be overly cautious? Perhaps, but the schools recognize the possibility that some people won't be able to afford tickets and donations at the same level as they have in the past and some will simply choose not to attend and donate. That might not be much of a concern for Alabama or Ohio State where they can be pretty sure that they can replace any ticket holders they lose, but the reality at Minnesota or Purdue is much different. We are all operating with great uncertainty and, while the scenario you describe could absolutely come to pass and SEC football might go off without a hitch, it's silly to pretend that it's the only potential outcome.
It shouldn't be a political debate on whether or not they should play, but that is what it has become. Aside from that, I agree with you that there is no certain outcome.
But making plans today to basically derail 2 seasons instead of 1, is a huge mistake. Especially if the majority of the other P5 conferences plan to play a normal fall schedule next year.
If they are able to get through this fall season, they absolutely will be playing a normal fall season next year. That would be another huge detriment to the B1G, and set them further behind.