Each player suspended was given a copy of the report. One of those players gave it to the media. That seems to be the belief out there.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
or a more likely possibility is this:
the female's lawyer(s) partially released (apparently leaving 20 pages out that are more damaging to the female accusers credibility) what was/is supposed to be a confidential EOAA "report" to KSTP-channel 5. likely with encouragement from someone named kimberly hewitt in the the female activist driven EOAA office, along with a wink & a nod from kaler/coyle, so that they could sheepishly close administrative ranks to unfairly start and win a PR battle of "trial by public tarring & feathering" of the accused. one they knew would be waged and quickly won by social activists on campus, by a mostly liberal media, and in the general public due to the "salacious" nature and descriptions in the only partially released & one-sided EOAA "report".
highly unlikely the illegal leak of the extremely one-sided EOAA "report" to KSTP-channel 5 came from one of the accused.
now that the confidential and extremely one-sided EOAA "report" has been illegally leaked to the press and further dragged the accused through the mud before they have even had a university appeal hearing......you understandably see some of the advocates for the accused fighting back in the only way they probably see as meaningful at this point....by attempting to take back some of the narrative that is attempting to cement itself.
they are doing this by starting to release some of the other investigative details found about the female accuser (like those from the actual one and only true constitutionally legal investigation done by the MPD & Hennepin County DA) that haven't yet seen the light of day in the "public square of opinion" and that likely don't paint the female accuser in the angelic light some in the female activist community are trying to portray and cement in narrative about the alleged "victim".
not saying i agree with any of it or the tactics on either side of the whole equation. i would prefer to have matters, and any punishment or non-criminal sanctions levied against an accused person, be solved in actual courts of law.....and only in U.S. constitutionally sanctioned courts of law. not in makeshift kangaroo university "courts".
that the kangaroo court system of an individual university gets to supersede the constitutional legal system and it's findings on a legal matter is what many find constitutionally disturbing here and about how "justice" is supposedly being levied here. it certainly isn't being levied "blindly" as it's supposed to be constitutionally.
from a purely tactical standpoint....all the accused are likely trying to do now is steal some degree of the narrative back in the court of public opinion. right or wrong....that is likely all this is. and they are using their advocates to help provide a megaphone.
and i find it disingenuous that anyone here likely wouldn't be doing the same if they in fact believed they were innocent and were not charged or arrested in a court of law...but then summarily had their reputation and name further dragged through the mud and destroyed by the media and by SJW activists in the EOAA office.