Did Ben and Katz really try to pass off the (non-conference) schedule as “tough”?Holding firm on playing Ball St. for another easy win and can use the excuse after that “when we scheduled the game, we thought they’d be good with a lot of returning talent”.
I’m not sure. I didn’t listen to the pod. I was just noting another post above saying they were holding firm on Ball St. Win-Win situation for Ben with him needing wins. Lose-lose situation for us the fansDid Ben and Katz really try to pass off the (non-conference) schedule as “tough”?
That would be quite the overstatement. Kudos for scheduling Mizzou, but the facts are at this point the Gophers have scheduled 2 decent (also San Francisco) opponents. Don’t assume your fans don’t know what a (reasonably) tough non-conference schedule looks like.
I heard it as Katz starting the conversation as a tough non-conference, using the Mizzou announcement as the starter. Ben built on that with commenting on Mizzou, San Fran, and Ball State (tourney team, but has now lost three to the transfer portal). Ben didn't overstate the overall toughness of the schedule.Did Ben and Katz really try to pass off the (non-conference) schedule as “tough”?
That would be quite the overstatement. Kudos for scheduling Mizzou, but the facts are at this point the Gophers have scheduled 2 decent (also San Francisco) opponents. Ben shouldn’t assume fans don’t know what a (reasonably) tough non-conference schedule looks like.
I agree Katz was the ignitor of the tough schedule talk. I agree Ben didn't overstate it.I heard it as Katz starting the conversation as a tough non-conference, using the Mizzou announcement as the starter. Ben built on that with commenting on Mizzou, San Fran, and Ball State (tourney team, but has now lost three to the transfer portal). Ben didn't overstate the overall toughness of the schedule.
If he wasn't scared of competition, he wouldn't have backed out of that tournament.I agree Katz was the ignitor of the tough schedule talk. I agree Ben didn't overstate it.
But, he didn't push back at the idea as silly either. He was bullish on his team and he did say:
"I'm not scared of competition." Ben Johnson
If Coyle sets a standard of number of wins without context of who those wins are against, he’s an idiot. I don’t think he’s an idiot.only Ben and Coyle really know what has been said behind the scenes.
But - if Coyle has told Ben that "you need to win x# of games to keep your job," then Ben has to look at that as his top priority as opposed to worrying about strength of schedule or 'Quad 1' games.
If this Gopher team was expected to be a top-half of the conference squad and an NCAA lock, then you approach the schedule differently. But if you're coaching for you job, you are going to look for wins wherever you can find them.
I hope your right.I think it is more along the lines of we are building from the ground up...we have the freshman, now sophomores, we have Christie, we got the two freshmen coming in. We'll have some veteran holdovers and Mr Coyle in year four we'll be really good. .... I think that's the storyline.
That's oven dialogue versus the microwave...Ben is old school baking. Evidently he has sold Coyle on his philosophy. Ben's words.
I don't think it matters if we only win 3 Big Ten games...Ben will be here. If he's not he'll be surprised. That's my take.
He has the powderpuff schedule to build confidence. He talks a lot about all his losing as a player and as a coach being a good thing for him...he understands it, he's used to it. It'll help us win....words to that effect is his thought.
If Coyle has set a magic number but didn’t stipulate he couldn’t cupcake the schedule that would be a pretty dumb conversation.only Ben and Coyle really know what has been said behind the scenes.
But - if Coyle has told Ben that "you need to win x# of games to keep your job," then Ben has to look at that as his top priority as opposed to worrying about strength of schedule or 'Quad 1' games.
If this Gopher team was expected to be a top-half of the conference squad and an NCAA lock, then you approach the schedule differently. But if you're coaching for you job, you are going to look for wins wherever you can find them.
I think it is more along the lines of we are building from the ground up...we have the freshman, now sophomores, we have Christie, we got the two freshmen coming in. We'll have some veteran holdovers and Mr Coyle in year four we'll be really good. .... I think that's the storyline.
That's oven dialogue versus the microwave...Ben is old school baking. Evidently he has sold Coyle on his philosophy. Ben's words.
I don't think it matters if we only win 3 Big Ten games...Ben will be here. If he's not he'll be surprised. That's my take.
He has the powderpuff schedule to build confidence. He talks a lot about all his losing as a player and as a coach being a good thing for him...he understands it, he's used to it. It'll help us win....words to that effect is his thought.
If Coyle has set a magic number but didn’t stipulate he couldn’t cupcake the schedule that would be a pretty dumb conversation.
SON never says anything “only they know” followed by wild speculation. That’s how he posts all the time.
I think you are exactly right!I am just expressing opinions - like everyone else on this board.
If there is a difference, I think it's that I tend to see issues as shades of gray as opposed to black and white.
Life is complicated. there are not a lot of easy, simple answers. and sports are often the same.
as I said, I think you approach scheduling based in part on expectations and the type of team you think you have. If you think you have a top-25 team, you're more willing to challenge them with stronger non-conference opponents. If you're trying to establish a program or build confidence with a younger team, then you're probably going to craft a schedule that gives them more opportunities to win games early and allow them to experience success.
and if you're a coach coming off two disappointing seasons, then you just want to win as many games as possible, because there is a chance you are coaching to keep your job.
Agreed. But that doesn't mean it would surprise me based on what I've heard pretty much any time Coyle speaks.If Coyle has set a magic number but didn’t stipulate he couldn’t cupcake the schedule that would be a pretty dumb conversation.
You’re probably right but committing to that now is a bad idea for the program. The future is now, and expecting improved performance based on a roster getting older no longer works in the free transfer era. Low likelihood of the players giving us hope staying on to lead the improvement.This is more or less how I view it. Keeps the “weee still heavy on underclassmen” excuse in play despite underclassmen dominating college basketball around the country. He can cite improvement or continuity with the “new” B1G. I don’t see how Ben isn’t the coach in 24-25. Even with a bottom 3 finish in the conference he’ll be back.
You don’t see how Ben could be fired? You don’t? Come on.This is more or less how I view it. Keeps the “weee still heavy on underclassmen” excuse in play despite underclassmen dominating college basketball around the country. He can cite improvement or continuity with the “new” B1G. I don’t see how Ben isn’t the coach in 24-25. Even with a bottom 3 finish in the conference he’ll be back.
Regardless how bad you Ben fired this year, he won’t be.You don’t see how Ben could be fired? You don’t? Come on.
Ben claims to be running a developmental program. If he gets more wins this year, but not enough to be convincing based on this year alone- then the question really is: Does the AD have the confidence that the right players are in place AND will stay the next year to produce the results needed to win big the following year?You’re probably right but committing to that now is a bad idea for the program. The future is now, and expecting improved performance based on a roster getting older no longer works in the free transfer era. Low likelihood of the players giving us hope staying on to lead the improvement.
Pretty good breakdown, Beeg.Ben claims to be running a developmental program. If he gets more wins this year, but not enough to be convincing based on this year alone- then the question really is: Does the AD have the confidence that the right players are in place AND will stay the next year to produce the results needed to win big the following year?
I'd say that the threshold win mark in the Big10 for that question to get asked is around 7.
0-5 fired
6 wins - there needs to be extenuating circumstances
7 wins - the edge
8+ wins- he returns almost undoubtedly
I think he can get the 8+. I like what he has and what appears to be great kids with great chemistry.
2 more coming in for the fall of '24....
That’s the really pathetic reality of the program now. NIT should not get an extension.If Gophers win 8 in Big Ten, we're likely at 18-19 wins with the soft non-conference schedule. That's possibly NIT. The way things work now, that'd probably get him a contract extension.
You are more confident than I am.Ben claims to be running a developmental program. If he gets more wins this year, but not enough to be convincing based on this year alone- then the question really is: Does the AD have the confidence that the right players are in place AND will stay the next year to produce the results needed to win big the following year?
I'd say that the threshold win mark in the Big10 for that question to get asked is around 7.
0-5 fired
6 wins - there needs to be extenuating circumstances
7 wins - the edge
8+ wins- he returns almost undoubtedly
I think he can get the 8+. I like what he has and what appears to be great kids with great chemistry.
2 more coming in for the fall of '24....
You don’t see how Ben could be fired? You don’t? Come on.
You’re probably right but committing to that now is a bad idea for the program. The future is now, and expecting improved performance based on a roster getting older no longer works in the free transfer era. Low likelihood of the players giving us hope staying on to lead the improvement.