Hollinsanity
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
- Messages
- 1,108
- Reaction score
- 11
- Points
- 38
Up next: Rutgers, Illinois and Purdue. Let's get this season back on track.
Which QB gives us the best chance to win all of these games, Rhoda or Leidner?
Really?
It's a fair question. This team looked more prepared and the OL improved their blocking immensely.Really?
It's a fair question. This team looked more prepared and the OL improved their blocking immensely.
I can't say Leidner is a vastly superior QB, but I don't know how much of this win rests on Rhoda's shoulders.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
It's a fair question. This team looked more prepared and the OL improved their blocking immensely.
I can't say Leidner is a vastly superior QB, but I don't know how much of this win rests on Rhoda's shoulders.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
It's a fair question. This team looked more prepared and the OL improved their blocking immensely.
I can't say Leidner is a vastly superior QB, but I don't know how much of this win rests on Rhoda's shoulders.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Ridiculous. Rhoda made the team more prepared?? Maybe the coaches realized they're coaching for their jobs. Maybe the kids stepped up their games cuz they knew they had to compensate for a first game former walk on QB. Leidner is heads and shoulders above CR- but I do appreciate him managing the game well enough for the win.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's a fair question. This team looked more prepared and the OL improved their blocking immensely.
I can't say Leidner is a vastly superior QB, but I don't know how much of this win rests on Rhoda's shoulders.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Which QB gives us the best chance to win all of these games, Rhoda or Leidner?
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Fire Claeys!!!! Just kidding. I like Claeys, I very much want him to succeed. They are really not far off of being 6-0 either. Please stop with the Rhoda > Leidner comments too, there's a good chance that was Rhoda's only career start at Minnesota. He's a nice backup but if they had to depend on him for a full season I think they'd have problems.
Nope- just saying when you realize you are now at a major disadvantage due to losing your senior QB you probably focus more effectively. Rhoda did nothing to improve the teams play directly and to try and make this into a QB controversy is insipid.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fire Claeys!!!! Just kidding. I like Claeys, I very much want him to succeed. They are really not far off of being 6-0 either. Please stop with the Rhoda > Leidner comments too, there's a good chance that was Rhoda's only career start at Minnesota. He's a nice backup but if they had to depend on him for a full season I think they'd have problems.
My thoughts on today's game:
1) Both Rodney and Shannon are great running backs, but right now I'd give the slight edge to Rodney because of his vision. The first TD run today where he spun out of a tackle on 3rd & 2 was a hell of a run. He also bounced a few runs outside that were designed to go inside really well. Impressive day for Rodney and he should be the # 1 back IMO, although Brooks should get 10+ carries a week as well. Pound the rock.
2) The number of Freshmen and Sophomores consistently making plays is impressive. Winfield, Hardin, Coughlin, Martin, the Huff brothers, Shenault and probably a few I am forgetting have looked damn good the past two weeks. The defense as a whole really has stepped up big time and I'm optimistic that they can keep us in any game the rest of the way, including Wisconsin and Nebraska.
3) Defense did a great job containing the Maryland QB. Clearly had the ability to make plays with his legs, but more often than not his scrambling resulted in a sack or throwaway.
4) Santoso had an underwhelming day (again). Started the season hot, but has had a few rough games in a row now. Need to get that cleaned up.
Overall, a solid win on the road against a decent (and likely somewhat overrated) Maryland team.
Another way of saying that is the rest of the team and the coaches realized that they needed to prepare and play at a higher level.
This begs one of two questions be answered.
Why weren't we already playing and preparing at this level already?
or
Is Maryland that bad of a team?
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Did Devers play? I don't remember seeing him.
Yep... he's #92. You can see the ankle sprain is still bothering him. No explosiveness.
It just proves the adage that nothing shuts up critics like winning.Anyone else notice how quiet it is around here after we win compared to when we lose? There are a few that seem to only show up when things are bad.
Anyone else notice how quiet it is around here after we win compared to when we lose? There are a few that seem to only show up when things are bad.