MGGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2008
- Messages
- 5,768
- Reaction score
- 3,091
- Points
- 113
As I recall, everyone knew we were full on rebuild when Kill got here. I don't recall people calling for his head in his first or second year or even third. The only time people started calling for his head was when his seizures got pretty bad. And with Fleck, no one is calling for his head either, but yes a lot of fans and people are frustrated because this was not a rebuild. It was a 9 win team. 9!!! Now we're losing to teams that won 1 or 2 B10 games only last year.
I'm also very frustrated. I expected 7-9 wins, and stupidly I even thought 10 or more were possible with this schedule. That said, I've adjusted my expectations based on several things I've since realized:
1) I understimated how difficult the switch to a zone blocking scheme would be for the OL -- especially the JUCO's. They're struggling.
2) I overestimated Rhoda's athletic ability and thought he'd run zone adequately. Maybe not as good as Mitch, but not so ineptly as he has.
3) I overestimated the talent returning in the DB core. Thought Shenault and Thomas would take huge steps forward, Durr would be healthy, and McGhee and Winfield would be playing.
Don't get me wrong: I lay some of the blame on the staff. I definitely think they've made tactical errors and would even go so far as to say the offensive staff has been badly outcoached in several games. Partly I think they're adjusting to B1G speed of play, but I also think they're being way too conservative and stubborn in wanting to run their schemes without the personnel. They don't have the QB to run zone read...so stop it. They don't have the OL to grind teams down to a pulp...so mix it up and finesse them. They don't have the WR's to get open on long-developing routes (or QB to get it there or OL to block it long enough against a good pass rush)...so stop. Team has had WAY more success with things we've done in the past: running stretch and jet sweep, throwing off play action, throwing quickly to the TE, etc.