GoAUpher
Section 246
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 6,256
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 36
However the temporary seating ultimately looks like the U is not going to be in a position to say no to it. Afterall, it will only be for two or three years. This is a state-wide issue and if it means keeping the Vikings or losing them the U will haveto agree with whatever the Governor and Legislature want. You need to get over idea that the U can operate independantly. Politics trumps everything when millions of dollars of taxpayer funding is at stake.
I'm not blind to the power of politics. My only point is that there is nothing short of being held hostage by the Legislature that serves as a reason for why the U would support this sort of a move. At least the talk about permanently expanding the seating has the benefit of a permanent expansion. Temporary seating does nothing for the U.
Assuming this ever comes to a head, if the U really wants to this is a PR fight they could fight and likely win. Popularity of the Vikings aside, it doesn't look to good if the Legislature threatens the state's flagship educational institution with budget cuts unless they allow a privately owned company to make undesirable changes to a brand new athletic facility. All during a budget shortfall that is already costing the U and the rest of the state dearly.
You also assume the NFL and the Vikings want that kind of showdown over 10-15 million dollars. Especially when that money is chump change compared to what they would be making when the new stadium is in play.
I'm not saying it can't or won't happen. I'm saying that IMO its less likely than you think. I'm also saying that I hope the U has the stones to stand up for itself if needed.