Hollinsanity
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
- Messages
- 1,108
- Reaction score
- 11
- Points
- 38
I don't see the U backing down and I don't see the players backing down either, so that being said I'll go with 25%.
What say you?
What say you?
100% we play
100% we play
I don't see the U backing down and I don't see the players backing down either, so that being said I'll go with 25%.
What say you?
100% we play
Why are you so confident?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Cooler heads will prevail they always do.
How many teams have threaten a boycott? Many.
How many actually have?
So you're saying the players, who have the full support of their coaches, are going to back down?
Because I don't see Kaler backing down given the current environment surrounding sexual assault.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The U will be out 2.8 million and will probably be sued by the Holiday Bowl for breach of contract. Neither Kaler or Coyle will survive this. There will also be repercussions from the B1G,
sponsors, etc.
The U will be out 2.8 million and will probably be sued by the Holiday Bowl for breach of contract. Neither Kaler or Coyle will survive this. There will also be repercussions from the B1G,
sponsors, etc.
Some one claiming the $2.8mm will expedite the resolution please enlighten me how you see the situation being resolved. I just don't see it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
75%. The players are going to see that the public reaction is not on their side at all and backdown, just like with the Yale case.
The problem that you have is that it has to be resolved quickly. They would need to have some kind of practice and then fly out to San Diego on prior to Christmas. Somebody is going to have to blink and I'm not sure who will be the ones to do it. I'm not sure how you go about mending fences here to make both sides happy.
The problem with this coming out when it did, and it was intentionally done at this time to cause as much pain to the players and program as possible, is that it gave very little time to come to a resolution.
Another brilliant take.
It all depends how the media frames it. Do you side with the black defendants wrongly convicted, or do you side with the feminist activists? I suspect many in the media will be torn on this. If they simply focus on the fiasco that is the Title IX mandates handed down by a political appointee in 2011 everyone wins. Except the activists.
It's not going to be whether you side with the "feminists", it's whether you are siding with the rape victim. This country just elected a President who put out a full page ad in the New York Times calling for the dearth penalty of four young black men after they had been exonerated by DNA evidence. This is not going to end the way the players are thinking it will.
75%. The players are going to see that the public reaction is not on their side at all and backdown, just like with the Yale case.