GophersInIowa
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Messages
- 44,056
- Reaction score
- 26,537
- Points
- 113
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Does this mean we should beat Iowa?
To be fair. One of our top 25 games in that span will be Iowa. And none of their top 25 games will be Minnesota,
So it still will be 10 Top 25 Teams for Minnesota and 3 for Iowa. To be fair that probably explains why Iowa is still a Top 25 team.
Good catch.
So are you saying if we only played teams like Wisconsin and northwestern and Pitt we would be ranked?
Originally Posted by Iceland12
So it still will be 10 Top 25 Teams for Minnesota and 3 for Iowa. To be fair that probably explains why Iowa is still a Top 25 team.
Good catch.
That's what you think? No, was saying that if Iowa played TCU, tOSU, MI plus WI and NW they wouldn't be in the Top 25.
You think they would be then. Good for you
If the gophers won at Wisconsin and northwestern, they'd be in the top 25 too.
Iowa 2-1 vs top 25 last 16 games
Minnesota 1-6
Tough to compare them. Iowa was pretty terrible last year, to the point that many thought Ferentz was on the hot seat entering the year. I personally thought Iowa would win the west this year going into the season and thought the gophers would probably be 7-5.
Looking like I'll be 50%.
We can whine about the schedule all we want, good teams win games. Bad teams don't.
Iowa 2-1 vs top 25 last 16 games
Minnesota 1-6
Tough to compare them. Iowa was pretty terrible last year, to the point that many thought Ferentz was on the hot seat entering the year. I personally thought Iowa would win the west this year going into the season and thought the gophers would probably be 7-5.
Looking like I'll be 50%.
We can whine about the schedule all we want, good teams win games. Bad teams don't.
Iowa 2-1 vs top 25 last 16 games
Minnesota 1-6
Rather than comparing schedules let's just watch the game in two weeks.
Closest you can come to admitting your wrong huh?
Wow, Iowa has a whopping 1 additional win vs top 25 compared to us. Such a huge difference.
A somewhat well reasoned take from a hawkeye....maybe we can all get along! [emoji6]Minnesota did a good job of scheduling TCU.
The rest is just how the B1G schedule came out. You can only play the conference games on the schedule.
Iowa is 8-0 due in part to the lack of quality crossover games in conference and catching teams at the right time (Wisconsin without Clement, for example). Iowa could lose to Indiana Saturday or to the Gophers or both. That's what makes the games fun to watch.
A somewhat well reasoned take from a hawkeye....maybe we can all get along! [emoji6]
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
That all maybe true and very reasonable. The real issue is that the B1G permitted this imbalance in the conference schedule to occur two years in a row when they knew that future schedule rotation would be starting from scratch when it goes to a 9 game conference schedule in 2016. Iowa and Wisconsin both benefited in 2014 and 15, the Gophers were disadvantaged. Furthermore, Iowa has avoided Ohio State more than any other B1G program, and giving them Ohio St in either 2014 or 2015, or 2016 for that matter, would've been appropriate. The B1G originally divided the conference Legend/Leaders based on historical success to balance the divisions, yet they couldn't devise a balanced schedule for the last two years of the 8 game schedule. Maybe I'm giving the B1G too much credit for having some intelligence.Minnesota did a good job of scheduling TCU.
The rest is just how the B1G schedule came out. You can only play the conference games on the schedule.
Iowa is 8-0 due in part to the lack of quality crossover games in conference and catching teams at the right time (Wisconsin without Clement, for example). Iowa could lose to Indiana Saturday or to the Gophers or both. That's what makes the games fun to watch.
That all maybe true and very reasonable. The real issue is that the B1G permitted this imbalance in the conference schedule to occur two years in a row when they knew that future schedule rotation would be starting from scratch when it goes to a 9 game conference schedule in 2016. Iowa and Wisconsin both benefited in 2014 and 15, the Gophers were disadvantaged. Furthermore, Iowa has avoided Ohio State more than any other B1G program, and giving them Ohio St in either 2014 or 2015, or 2016 for that matter, would've been appropriate. The B1G originally divided the conference Legend/Leaders based on historical success to balance the divisions, yet they couldn't devise a balanced schedule for the last two years of the 8 game schedule. Maybe I'm giving the B1G too much credit for having some intelligence.
Bingo. Barry was instrumental in this two year rotation, knowing full well that the whole thing would be blown up anyway (9 game schedule, expanding to 16, etc.). It was the equivalent of a money grab. They couldn't saddle everyone with tough crossovers and likely thought Iowa would be pretty bad. Notice Nebraska (who I'm sure they though would be pretty good got MSU). Gophers obviously offered little resistance and got rammed with Michigan and Ohio St. Barry and WI are quite detestable, but you can't argue against their on-field and AD office dominance. Give Iowa credit for winning the games on their schedule, but I could easily see Ohio St. beating them by 50 in the Big Ten Title game.