Pompous Elitist
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2013
- Messages
- 24,464
- Reaction score
- 8,329
- Points
- 113
It wouldn’t, but it would end this charade of amateurism as well as put the universities on the hook for more, which I am in support of given they’re reaping unholy sums of money while pushing boosters to line kids pockets while taking on little risk themselves. Some teams would balk and cut programs or their contracts would be worse, but that would be the discussion around salary caps
If it’s a charade that implies the players are already getting paid, so no action is needed. Or, if you mean some aren’t dedicated students or able to devote all their time to school well sure. Then again, the resources available to these guys in terms of academic support, online materials, etc is extraordinary these days.
The players need the programs as much as the programs need the players. Nobody is banging down the door to start a pro league with high schoolers and recent grads. If that market exists any number of entities would be interested in investing their leisure money. It doesn’t, or at least hasn’t been attempted.
I agree there should be a salary cap, tv revenue sharing amongst programs and even conferences but more in terms of limiting staff size and salaries, with the balance redirected to academic scholarships, faculty support. You know, the mission of universities.