Why?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They brought in 4 kickers - Lantz didn’t travel because of” leg tightness”
I guess the logic is that you need a 3 and out anyway.
I haven’t been on the board much this game, but I’m assuming someone has already explained how the unsportsmanlike conduct on iowa was AFTER the play?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Call to you idiot
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If I’m Iowa I go for it on 4th if they don’t get it on 3
Dumbest post since Tyler isn't a good WR.
If I’m Iowa I go for it on 4th if they don’t get it on 3
Only problem is that without PJ's sprint. The correct late hit is called. Defensive late hits have an auto first down. Unsportsmanlike does not.
"Can we make the late hit an unsportsmanlike and 'match' them?" Yup. " Let's do that." Separated by time they get marched in order. 2 yrs against Iowa. 15 against Mn.
Pj stays put. It is a late hit. Auto first down.
Only problem is that without PJ's sprint. The correct late hit is called. Defensive late hits have an auto first down. Unsportsmanlike does not.
"Can we make the late hit an unsportsmanlike and 'match' them?" Yup. " Let's do that." Separated by time they get marched in order. 2 yrs against Iowa. 15 against Mn.
Pj stays put. It is a late hit. Auto first down.
I don’t get it. PJ had a terrible day.
Only problem is that without PJ's sprint. The correct late hit is called. Defensive late hits have an auto first down. Unsportsmanlike does not.
"Can we make the late hit an unsportsmanlike and 'match' them?" Yup. " Let's do that." Separated by time they get marched in order. 2 yrs against Iowa. 15 against Mn.
Pj stays put. It is a late hit. Auto first down.
Indeed he did. This is his and his DC's loss.
Dumbest post since Tyler isn't a good WR.
++1We got em right where we want them.