BTChamp
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2019
- Messages
- 7,429
- Reaction score
- 7,109
- Points
- 113
Its the principle of it.The penalty itself would have been the same with a targeting. But DB 31 would have been ejected.
Its the principle of it.The penalty itself would have been the same with a targeting. But DB 31 would have been ejected.
PJ may be too stubborn for his own good, but he’s still high quality overall. Everyone has their problems, stubbornness and lack of concept of time are arguably PJs biggest ones.Tanner Morgan is going to cost Minnesota yet another game. It shows PJ's lack of ability to make adjustments both pre-game and mid-game. Thankfully they decided to do that extension mid-season...
Uh oh.Ky grabbed his leg
Doesn't have to be upward thrust, just one of the following indicators below. I think you could argue he was leading with his helmet, thus targeting.Agreed with your notion of inconsistency in enforcement. However, There was no upward thrust, Just forward. if I read it right, then no targeting on that play.
Including a Kramer special on 2nd down. Three red zone FGs.Moving the ball well.....and then two straight runs up the gut.
Until they reached the 20 and then its back to back RUTM.got a little rhythm going.
Anyone on the d-line doing something would be nice.Need a play from mafe. It’s time.
"Wildcat."Including a Kramer special on 2nd down. Three red zone FGs.