Deleted_User
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2011
- Messages
- 7,831
- Reaction score
- 535
- Points
- 113
Will they vote 'aye' or 'nay'?
They are paid probably $80,000 a year now. Unionization would not only kill college football, but almost all college sports that depend on football/basketball revenue to survive.
I think they'll vote "aye," but they shouldn't.
I don't see it passing... we can only cross our fingers. If it passes I do predict that all the kids with free rides will be let go from there scholarship and filled with walk ons..
Well, you should LIKE that outcome! Just think what GREAT shape that will put NCAA Football in! Since it is any benefits that the players might get that put NCAA Football as we know it in danger, just think of ALL the money that would then be available to jack up the bonus clauses, and salaries of the head coaches, coordinators and assistant coaches, not to mention the athletic directors pay off!
I'll say no. Judging from that q&a document there appears to be a lot of unanswered questions from both the players and parents.
I am hoping that the students vote yea. I think this will be a great exercise in the potential of negotiating and bargaining. And, the influence of 3rd parties, like the NCAA or television will be diminished, which is nothing but a good thing. I hope that academic issues will be raised, like increasing study time, free time, and the ability to schedule classes when available. There are so many issues that potentially could or should be brought forward over time. I think the students at Northwestern are bright, intelligent, and capable of organizing well and looking out for group and individual interests as a union. To me, this has all the makings of a great American experiment. And, it ought to move forward as such. If they kill it they will have lost a great opportunity to try something different in all of college athletics. This is such a unique opportunity, why waste it with a nay vote! It is almost unthinkable for me to see it any other way. This is no more a slippery slope than doing nothing, which is ripe with latent costs in terms of long term injuries, the plague of scheduling classes, and access to social life during the season with someone other than football players. The players already can negotiate separate deals with the university. But, what they can not do as individuals, they may accomplish as a group. That is a dynamic I hope they do not forget.
You are right. There is much for the players and parents to be concerned about. There could be a real downside for the players having a say about stipends for their personal living expenses, the amount of time they spend at football practice, the ability to choose their major, and the long term health impacts of injuries sustained when they played for Dear Old Alma Mater.
One thing I find a bit amusing is Fitzgerald telling the players you can trust me and not some other party. Who is to say he doesn't leave the program as happens from time to time with coaches. If a new coach and/or administration comes in, it could be good or bad for the players. It cuts both ways. I'm not saying the players should vote yes but the NW slant is very one sided.
They already have a say about all of those things. Good try, though.You are right. There is much for the players and parents to be concerned about. There could be a real downside for the players having a say about stipends for their personal living expenses, the amount of time they spend at football practice, the ability to choose their major, and the long term health impacts of injuries sustained when they played for Dear Old Alma Mater.
That's the typical response from management that faces a unionization effort. They always say trust us, we know what's best for you and have your best interests at heart. Only an idiot would believe them.
That's the typical response from management that faces a unionization effort. They always say trust us, we know what's best for you and have your best interests at heart. Only an idiot would believe them.
So you think everything should be unionized?
Ask GM and Chrysler how that worked out for them.
Fuzzy, the last I heard, they were both still in business.
Thanks to a bail out.
Unlike Wall Street huh?
Really? - As opposed to believing your holier than thou proselytizing? Contrary to your belief this issue is much more complicated than you would have us believe or think. There are far more legitimate issues and reasonable beliefs than just yours. I hope you haven't hurt your back in congratulating yourself with your superiority. Your arrogance is something to behold.
So you think everything should be unionized?
Ask GM and Chrysler how that worked out for them.