Since Fleck, the Gophers have given up 127 sacks, an average of 1.8 per game. In the last three years, 1.5 per game. This season 1.1 per game (only 13 total). They are ranked 19th in the NCAA this season.Fleck Olines have always been good on the ground game. Pass protection has been weaker.
You don’t think us running the ball like a service academy has anything to do with that stat?Since Fleck, the Gophers have given up 127 sacks, an average of 1.8 per game. In the last three years, 1.5 per game. This season 1.1 per game (only 13 total). They are ranked 19th in the NCAA this season.
The NCAA average is over 2 a game.
What does your statement mean?
Forgot Mister. 20 and 18Roster today, of those who can return, shakes out as follows (reflects 2022 status):
RS Senior/Grad.: Boe, Shaw, Carroll
RS Junior: Guedet, Cooper
RS Soph.: Ersery: Lewis, Lawrence, J. Ruschmeyer (w/o)
RS Frosh: Purcell, Hunter (w/o)
Frosh: Nelson, Beers, McConnell, Alvarez
Committed: Williams, Johnson, Daniels, Tripp
That's 19 with 17 scholarships. About right. If a player or two retires or transfers (after the bowl game or spring practice), I could see PJ bringing on a transfer or two at the more mid-to-senior level. We've got plenty of young prospects from this year and last.
In B1G play we gave up 11 sacks in 197 passes or about 1 every 20 passes. We're not going to pass the ball 20 more times a game. Likely about 10.You don’t think us running the ball like a service academy has anything to do with that stat?
Does NCAA track "hurries"? I feel like there were lots of those this year, even if not sacks.In B1G play we gave up 11 sacks in 197 passes or about 1 every 20 passes. We're not going to pass the ball 20 more times a game. Likely about 10.
We won both games giving up 3 sacks NE and WI
We lost to Pur/Ill in giving up 2 sacks
Lost at PSU giving up 1 sacks.
No sacks in IA, Rut., MSU, NW games.
I would say the pass protection was even better because when we passed the ball most often everyone knew we had to pass the ball.
I haven't found the stat anywhere. I tend to agree and would like to see those numbers if they have them.Does NCAA track "hurries"? I feel like there were lots of those this year, even if not sacks.
I know, it doesn't fit your narrative. Sorry that the actual statistics bother you. I get it.You don’t think us running the ball like a service academy has anything to do with that stat?
Boe at center
Cooper/Shaw at guards
Lewis, Guedet, Ersery battle it out at tackles
That top 6 has a good blend of experience, age, and skill.
If some younger guys step up then it’s even better. Add in 1/2 late cycle OL and we could have a quality line that doesn’t have to block as hard with an explosive QB/WR/RB core.
It means that Morgan, who is not mobile, was forced to throw hurriedly on many occasions to avoid the sack. A QB who can step up in the pocket or move outside the pocket does not need the line to hold their blocks quite as long.Since Fleck, the Gophers have given up 127 sacks, an average of 1.8 per game. In the last three years, 1.5 per game. This season 1.1 per game (only 13 total). They are ranked 19th in the NCAA this season.
The NCAA average is over 2 a game.
What does your statement mean?
My bad. Fixed. Thanks. That is plenty of bodies. No need to hit the portal unless a couple leave the roster.Forgot Mister. 20 and 18
Take up your weird attitude with the guy you initially responded to.I know, it doesn't fit your narrative. Sorry that the actual statistics bother you. I get it.
Minnesota finishing in the upper half of the NCAA passing efficiency, 40 spots north of West Point and 60 spots north of Iowa doesn't matter either. I get it.
Our O-line sucks at protecting the QB because you want to say it. I get it.
So what you are saying is it has nothing to do with the line. My point exactly.It means that Morgan, who is not mobile, was forced to throw hurriedly on many occasions to avoid the sack. A QB who can step up in the pocket or move outside the pocket does not need the line to hold their blocks quite as long.
It also means sack stats alone don't tell the entire story with respect to pass blocking. That's why they also keep track of hurries, batted balls, and throw always.
So you just changed what you said to fit again fit your narrative.Take up your weird attitude with the guy you initially responded to.
You posted a statistic that was in dire need of context. And this new stat you provided includes two of the worst offensive teams in CFB. Iowa made history for how bad they were.
Also if you take out our first 4 games against suspect competition those efficiency metrics would change a lot.
I’m going to stop you from speaking for me to say I think our Offense did well this year. OL was great for run blocking but could improve in pass blocking, but part of that was also QB/WR play. Next year with more dynamic personnel I think we can be even better.
Good information. I think in the zone scheme we use the tackles have the toughest assignment as they often have a guy way outside in space to block and also as stated, the RB and QB plays a huge role in getting sacked in this offense.Regarding the pass blocking argument, both tackles could use some significant improvement according to PFF, but the other positions did pretty decent in pass blocking. The tackle pass blocking position can be tough to learn. Being put on an island against a twitchy fast defensive end or linebacker on 3rd and long is one of the toughest jobs in football, if not the toughest.
View attachment 22667
I'd also add that sometimes a sack isn't the fault of the offensive line. Running backs often miss blocks on twists and blitzes, sometimes the defense sends more defenders than there are blockers, and sometimes the QB simply holds the ball too long. Regardless, there can be improvement.
Good information. I think in the zone scheme we use the tackles have the toughest assignment as they often have a guy way outside in space to block and also as stated, the RB and QB plays a huge role in getting sacked in this offense.
Or the OL does a great job, and the QB just takes a really bad angle/route to try to escape pressure and ends up running right into the guy that the OL otherwise had blocked well ... "sack" is given and thus marked against the OL. Etc. Very thankless job, which is captain obvious anyway.Regarding the pass blocking argument, both tackles could use some significant improvement according to PFF, but the other positions did pretty decent in pass blocking. The tackle pass blocking position can be tough to learn. Being put on an island against a twitchy fast defensive end or linebacker on 3rd and long is one of the toughest jobs in football, if not the toughest.
View attachment 22667
I'd also add that sometimes a sack isn't the fault of the offensive line. Running backs often miss blocks on twists and blitzes, sometimes the defense sends more defenders than there are blockers, and sometimes the QB simply holds the ball too long. Regardless, there can be improvement.
IF Lewis can make the transition to RG, then this looks solid to me. Making that transition can be harder than it seems. (Of course, so can going the other way.)Did you forget Quinn Carroll?
I would guess this is the starting OL vs. Nebraska in the '23 opener:
LT: Ersery
LG: Cooper or Shaw
C: Boe
RG: Lewis
RT: Carroll
If we are as run oriented as in 2021, I like Carroll at tackle. If we move to more pass oriented, from what I’ve heard regarding footwork, I think I like Lewis/Guedet at RT and Carroll moving inside to RG. Of course we know nothing compared to what the coaches see for 2023.IF Lewis can make the transition to RG, then this looks solid to me. Making that transition can be harder than it seems. (Of course, so can going the other way.)
If Carroll is better able/equipped to make that transition, then it wouldn't surprise me if they ask him to move inside so that Lewis can start training up to be the starting RT. Or like you said later in the post, maybe there is a younger guy who leaps over.
Not sure if Boe is better at C or G, but I think he can do either, as can Shaw. So whichever of those two is worse at G, I would guess they'll ask the better guy to be G and the other to be C.
There is rumor that Cooper will retire.
Did you forget Quinn Carroll?
I would guess this is the starting OL vs. Nebraska in the '23 opener:
LT: Ersery
LG: Cooper or Shaw
C: Boe
RG: Lewis
RT: Carroll
There are some young guys (including the new signees), who could turn out to be big time studs. But, not quite yet.
We could make a run at an OL transfer or two after the bowl or after spring (especially if there's a sure shot starter available), but I think the current returning/arriving group is a solid one with tons of upside. I would probably not add OL transfer just for depth at this point. Has to be a legit starter wanting to transfer to bring one in.
I think it ends up looking something similar to this:I just don't see Lewis playing guard. He and Tyrell Lawrence are the biggest players on the OL and are both bigger than Ersery/Carroll. You don't typically move those guys inside.
Footwork is always important at all OL positions, of course. That said, it is "more" important for the Tackle. You really have to be on your technique game as a 300+ pounder to keep up with speedy edge rushers.If we are as run oriented as in 2021, I like Carroll at tackle. If we move to more pass oriented, from what I’ve heard regarding footwork, I think I like Lewis/Guedet at RT and Carroll moving inside to RG. Of course we know nothing compared to what the coaches see for 2023.
Depends how well he (Lewis) can bend his knees, lower his center of gravity, and punch. Taller guys who can do that, can be quite successful on the interior. But that said, when you're that tall it is that much harder.I just don't see Lewis playing guard. He and Tyrell Lawrence are the biggest players on the OL and are both bigger than Ersery/Carroll. You don't typically move those guys inside.