Here's a little piece from the article:
The U's way of showing patience was extending Johnson's contract before last season through 2027. His buyout also changed, making it potentially more expensive to fire him after this season. In his original deal, the U agreed to pay 100% of the remaining $2 million annual base salary in his contract if it fired him after Year 1 or Year 2, and then 75% after this season.
The contract language now says the U would pay Johnson 100% of his remaining base salary if it fires him after this season.
Gophers athletic director
Mark Coyle expressed his support for Johnson this fall.
"There was not going to be a quick fix," Coyle said. "But Ben clearly understands that winning is a big part of what we do here."
The first part is VERY confusing. There's simply no way, after a last place finish and failing to land local talent, that Ben Johnson's contract was extended in a way that forced the U to pay him 100% of his remaining salary after he'd been coach 3 years. I am pretty certain a number of really successful coaches don't have that type of security/guarantee. How this is written makes me wonder if it's 1 year of base salary he's owed when terminated.
The second part with Coyle (which I think is an old quote) can be interpreted many different ways. A quick fix has been done almost everywhere including in the B1G at a worse job in Penn State recently. It's been done at Iowa State, Marquette, Missouri, Mississippi State, etc. I don't think anyone would suggest 3 years falls under the category of a "quick fix" in college basketball. The "but Ben clearly understands that winning is a big part of what we do here." seems every bit as important as the "There was not going to be a quick fix".
I will say that if they are planning on bringing Ben back after another non NCAA tournament season, they have done a TERRIBLE job of selling the fanbase on any of this going back to the day Ben got the job. If you look at the Whalen press conference to announce her termination, Coyle could not have been more tepid in his comments in regards to Johnson.