New ESPN Streaming App Marks Major Shift in Disney Strategy

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
63,833
Reaction score
22,301
Points
113
Per FOS:

ESPN has finalized its plans for its highly anticipated, direct-to-consumer streaming service, simply calling it “ESPN,” while the Disney-owned company says the project will “redefine our business.”

After considering a variety of other names for the long-planned offering that previously carried a working title of “Flagship,” ESPN chairman Jimmy Pitaro said, “There’s real power in our four letters.” The service will involve a rebuilt ESPN app, with users then able to buy into the broader video packages.

An unlimited package, carrying all of ESPN’s networks, will cost $29.99 per month on an unbundled basis, and $35.99 per month when bundled with ad-based versions of sister properties Disney+ and Hulu. An initial promotion, however, will bring that latter cost down to $29.99 per month for the first 12 months. With the new service, ESPN is leaning in to a mantra of “all of ESPN, all in one place” and touting a live portfolio with more than 47,000 annual events.

“This is going to redefine our business, and it’s going to reflect the innovation that’s been a hallmark of ESPN since its earliest days,” Pitaro said in a press event Tuesday morning.

A specific debut date is still being developed and will be disclosed this summer, but it will be around the start of the 2025 pro and college football seasons.

The DTC effort, a major priority across ESPN’s corporate parent Disney, is happening as the company is looking to fight an industry-wide decline in linear television subscribers as cord-cutting and cord-nevering accelerate.

“We’re really looking at the 60 million–plus households [in the U.S.] that are on the sidelines,” Pitaro said, referring to those consumers without any sort of tie to ESPN. “We are platform-agnostic.”


Go Gophers!!
 

Probably several threads this could fit under but I'm putting it here, props to Bleed!

Not much mentioned here about the recent squabble between Disney/ESPN and YouTube TV. Disney/ESPN has pulled all of their content from YouTube TV, which in turn has given subscribers a $20 credit or something like that.

I use a number of providers but predominantly use YouTube TV. This hasn't affected me much, I don't want Disney and ESPN has been an unmitigated dumpster fire for years now.

But I'm curious what others are using for their primary streaming/cable/satellite. I know this has been covered here but it does tend to change over time for some.

I dipped my toe into the water with Sling early in the year. If you stream a lot of shows (I watch some real crime shows like See No Evil and Murder in the Heartland, et al), Sling is really good; entire libraries of shows available on demand, and hundreds of shows I had never heard of available. The list seems endless.

I have Peacock mostly for cycling events like the Tour de France, etc.
 

I use YTTV and find this very annoying as I mostly use it to watch sports, but the significant other likes it for the TV shows and being able to record and go back and watch. If they end up not being able to negotiate it.
Maybe I'll just pirate it, not that anyone such as myself has ever done that at any point ever in the past. most definitely not as that would be wrong.
 

Per FOS:

ESPN has finalized its plans for its highly anticipated, direct-to-consumer streaming service, simply calling it “ESPN,” while the Disney-owned company says the project will “redefine our business.”

After considering a variety of other names for the long-planned offering that previously carried a working title of “Flagship,” ESPN chairman Jimmy Pitaro said, “There’s real power in our four letters.” The service will involve a rebuilt ESPN app, with users then able to buy into the broader video packages.

An unlimited package, carrying all of ESPN’s networks, will cost $29.99 per month on an unbundled basis, and $35.99 per month when bundled with ad-based versions of sister properties Disney+ and Hulu. An initial promotion, however, will bring that latter cost down to $29.99 per month for the first 12 months. With the new service, ESPN is leaning in to a mantra of “all of ESPN, all in one place” and touting a live portfolio with more than 47,000 annual events.

“This is going to redefine our business, and it’s going to reflect the innovation that’s been a hallmark of ESPN since its earliest days,” Pitaro said in a press event Tuesday morning.

A specific debut date is still being developed and will be disclosed this summer, but it will be around the start of the 2025 pro and college football seasons.

The DTC effort, a major priority across ESPN’s corporate parent Disney, is happening as the company is looking to fight an industry-wide decline in linear television subscribers as cord-cutting and cord-nevering accelerate.

“We’re really looking at the 60 million–plus households [in the U.S.] that are on the sidelines,” Pitaro said, referring to those consumers without any sort of tie to ESPN. “We are platform-agnostic.”


Go Gophers!!
Platform-agnostic,

Such a great BS business term
 

We use YTTV and will continue to. I'm not missing much other than a few Saturday games I wouldn't mind watching. I don't have much time to watch college basketball games during the week so nothing lost there. The layout is so much better than most others IMO and I really like being able to watch 4 channels at once if I want.

In addition we have Disney for the kids and Netflix all the time. Then periodically get Peacock and Apple for a few months, binge watch and then cancel.
 








Top Bottom