Teams have had stinkers in out of conference play and went on to have good seasons in the past. If I recall my criteria for success this year (and I'm not going to go look up the old thread to double check), they are all still in play. I believe I said I would call this year successful if any one of three things happened:
1. 9 total wins (including bowl/postseason): if we are even in the running for this, we have a bowl game coming, so we've got at least 9 more games to get 7 more wins in a division that looks very underwhelming right now
2.. Win the west and play in the B1G championship game, regardless of record: Bowling Green doesn't even impact this goal, we still control our destiny
3. Win at least 8 (including postseason) including Iowa and Wisconsin: Wisconsin looks mortal, I keep trying to tell myself Iowa isn't as good as they look (though its tough not to give them the benefit of the doubt so long as they keep winning), but we can still pull this one off too.
Bottom-line: everyone had their own expectations to start the year, and I'm pretty sure almost every one of the paths you took to determining those expectations assumed a win against Bowling Green. We didn't get that win, but we are back on track as soon as we replace it with a win in one of your assumed losses (I think I saw some people projecting good seasons that included a loss at Colorado). It stinks to lose one we shouldn't, but fine, let's win one we shouldn't (Wisconsin? Iowa?). I'll be as upset as anyone else if we have a bad season that included a loss to Bowling Green, but if it ends up being a good year despite the loss, it will just be a footnote. I think I would have still enjoyed 2019 if we had ended 10-3 with a loss to Georgia Southern, which isn't that far removed from what actually happened.