wait!what?
Active member
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2009
- Messages
- 3,179
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
Not really. Just wanted to be first.
Start them both. Put two quarterbacks in the backfield at the same time. The defense would never know who is going to get the ball. I think in some of the formations from the really old days, it was never clear who was going to get the snap. Of course, I'm not serious about going THAT old school.
Bring back the single wing![]()
Except it will be Nelson. All those people forgot about Shortell once Nelson signed.LOL - give it few losses and the Shortell for QB supporters may come out again.
Start them both. Put two quarterbacks in the backfield at the same time. The defense would never know who is going to get the ball. I think in some of the formations from the really old days, it was never clear who was going to get the snap. Of course, I'm not serious about going THAT old school.
LOL - give it few losses and the Shortell for QB supporters may come out again.
Well, that would take Brewster off the hook again, by usurping his idiotic use of McKnight in his freshman year, as the dumbest, biggest waste of a season of eligibility in the history of Golden Gopher football.Personally, I think we should play 10 games, and only THEN put in Nelson for his first play of the season on a 3rd & long, and he can execute a quick kick.
I really don't get the ripping of Shortell. He's a big athletic kid who was thrown in to the fire last year (as a true freshman) when Marqueis was either hurt or not performing well. Max was not at spring practice last year so he did not have that extra experience. He has matured physically this year, gaining strength and size (he has gained 15 lbs from last year, going from 220 to 235). I still contend that he is a much more acurate passer than Marqueis. That being said, I still support MG and hope he has an excellent year, which should lead to more wins. If not, then I want the best person in there who will help the Gophers win.
As for Nelson, I hope he redshirts this season. I think a year's experience, especially at QB, is essential for anyone making the jump from HS to D1 ball.
Gray's improvement from start to end of the year was drastic. I expect goods things from him this year!I freely admit I pushed for Shortell to start last year and Gray be moved back to WR because it wasn't a question of whether Shortell was necessarily straight up better than Gray, it was a question of whether Shortell with Gray and McKnight was a better combo than Gray with McKnight and ???. Depending on how much McDonald and Harbison can contribute this year, the argument doesn't have legs anymore because Gray probably isn't a better receiver than them right now, considering he'd be starting over again. However, if Gray had played WR last year I think we'd be talking about redshirting both McDonald and Harbison.
I freely admit I pushed for Shortell to start last year and Gray be moved back to WR because it wasn't a question of whether Shortell was necessarily straight up better than Gray, it was a question of whether Shortell with Gray and McKnight was a better combo than Gray with McKnight and ???. Depending on how much McDonald and Harbison can contribute this year, the argument doesn't have legs anymore because Gray probably isn't a better receiver than them right now, considering he'd be starting over again. However, if Gray had played WR last year I think we'd be talking about redshirting both McDonald and Harbison.
oh o! Gray isn't a better WR than what we have? There goes his pro shot - darn it! Wasted in on playing QB.
Gray's improvement from start to end of the year was drastic. I expect goods things from him this year!
I don't think the numbers really bear that out. His averages, splitting up the games into sets of 3:
1st 3 - 123.63 Rtg, 5.66 ypc
2nd 3 - 67.9 Rtg, 2.26 ypc
3rd 3 - 147.23 Rtg, 4.08 ypc
4th 3 - 88.9 Rtg, 5.41 ypc
Gray's improvement from start to end of the year was drastic. I expect goods things from him this year!
I don't think the numbers really bear that out. His averages, splitting up the games into sets of 3:
1st 3 - 123.63 Rtg, 5.66 ypc
2nd 3 - 67.9 Rtg, 2.26 ypc
3rd 3 - 147.23 Rtg, 4.08 ypc
4th 3 - 88.9 Rtg, 5.41 ypc
I don't think the numbers really bear that out. His averages, splitting up the games into sets of 3:
1st 3 - 123.63 Rtg, 5.66 ypc
2nd 3 - 67.9 Rtg, 2.26 ypc
3rd 3 - 147.23 Rtg, 4.08 ypc
4th 3 - 88.9 Rtg, 5.41 ypc
Obviously the numbers bear that out.
First off, his QTB rating is considerably better in the last 6 than it is in the first 6, against way better competition.
Now, I assume that your point is that his QB rating in the last 3 games was worse than the 3 games prior, however, that is really not telling the entire story. In Gray's last 3 games, he ran for 395 yards (132 yards per) and 3 TDs. His overrall production in those last 3 games was really high. If you only look at QB rating, Gray's game against Purdue was about as good as his game against NW (that's not reality).
When you look at his production at the QB, he was greatly improved from the begining of the season THROUGH the end of the season.
And if you ignore the statistics altogether, we lost to a vastly inferior opponent (and one somewhat-inferior opponent) in the first third of the season, while we defeated one vastly superior opponent (and one somewhat-superior opponent) in the final third of the season. It is a team game, no doubt, but the QB (especially in Kill's offense) is a disproportionately large part of that team.
Not really. Just wanted to be first.