Thinking more like Houston, Louisville, Boise State, No.Ill, etc. You know, the G5 teams...there's quite a few.
Can you think of a more objective measure of talent on a roster?
We will see how good this guy is in the cold weather games of November. Coming from Louisiana I have my doubts.
By your logic a team with 2 NFL Draftees and me as their third best player is more talented than a team with only 1 NFL draftee even if they had 20-30 other very good players (on special teams too). It is simply a flawed measure.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Haha, you beat me to it. Furthermore, the teams that do win 10 games and have zero draft picks... probably about to have another nice season.
Like I said, not very often. PSU happened to have a loaded junior class and are expected to have over 10 guys drafted this year. https://www.landof10.com/penn-state/nfl-draft-penn-state-2018-prospects
Here's my admittedly tongue-in-cheek scenario.
Gopher go 8-5 next season - 7-5 in regular season, and win a bowl game. But, if they don't have any players chosen in the NFL draft, then the record is revised to 8*-5. yes, you get an asterisk if no one is drafted.
Seriously, I have to think that some NFL team is going to draft Richardson. After that, there are a lot of maybes - guys who, if they stay healthy, have a good season, test well at the combine, or have a good pro day, could sneak into a late-round draft choice. That list includes McGhee, Lingen, Celestin, Poock, Santoso, and even Wozniak, just on measurables. Out of that list, I would think that at least 1 or 2 will wind up at least as a 7th-round choice.
Exactly. Draft-able seniors is not a good measure of a team, their success or talent on the team.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
To get this back on track:
I just spent the weekend in Lincoln and was talking to some people I know down there, including a former player.
To a man, they said (and I'm not joking) that their biggest concern is that Tanner Lee heads to the draft after this year. 1 of the big reasons was that he was invited to the Manning camp. And they "heard" that he outperformed "that Groff [sic] guy that was drafted this year".
Tulane allowed 25 sacks per game in 2014 and 26 in 2015. That's 60th and 59th in FBS or nearly perfectly average. I'm not sure how to reconcile that with your statement. Looks like he threw around 30 passes a game. He must have been hurt a few times as he missed some games both years. He played in 9 games in 2014 (started game 1) and 10 in 2015.
Maybe he was playing, hurt playing scared, whatever. Like I said, I'll believe it when I see it vs live bullets.
That's a lot of times to be sacked in a game. That's 300 times in a season. It's a wonder he's still alive. I guess Nebraska wants a vegetable at QB.
To get this back on track:
I just spent the weekend in Lincoln and was talking to some people I know down there, including a former player.
To a man, they said (and I'm not joking) that their biggest concern is that Tanner Lee heads to the draft after this year. 1 of the big reasons was that he was invited to the Manning camp. And they "heard" that he outperformed "that Groff [sic] guy that was drafted this year".
What's your metric?
If only there was some metric to measure how talented a team is. Maybe if there was one they could also use it to determine the order of finish for a division.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If only there was some metric to measure how talented a team is. Maybe if there was one they could also use it to determine the order of finish for a division.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Time to go back and read...
Exactly. Draft-able seniors is not a good measure of a team, their success or <b>talent on the team. </b>
What's your metric?
...
Mine is Wins
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So we have more talent than Texas, Notre Dame, LSU and Auburn? Right.....
So we have more talent than Texas, Notre Dame, LSU and Auburn? Right.....
Here's my admittedly tongue-in-cheek scenario.
Gopher go 8-5 next season - 7-5 in regular season, and win a bowl game. But, if they don't have any players chosen in the NFL draft, then the record is revised to 8*-5. yes, you get an asterisk if no one is drafted.
Seriously, I have to think that some NFL team is going to draft Richardson. After that, there are a lot of maybes - guys who, if they stay healthy, have a good season, test well at the combine, or have a good pro day, could sneak into a late-round draft choice. That list includes McGhee, Lingen, Celestin, Poock, Santoso, and even Wozniak, just on measurables. Out of that list, I would think that at least 1 or 2 will wind up at least as a 7th-round choice.
This is a huge advantage for Nebraska to have a seasoned guy even if it's his first year there.
We'll be going with someone brand new who barely played.
Definitely a risk when it comes to winning early season games.
Which one you prefer now?
Reading the saturation coverage of Husker football in these parts, my guess is Lee improves as the season goes on and, overall, does better than either of our QBs, and Nebraska does better by at least a game or two than we do. For them, the first big test will be a huge one - Wisconsin in early October; for us, Maryland, a week earlier.
His performance thus far is mirroring his time at Tulane. What would cause you to guess he improves as the year progresses?
To get this back on track:
I just spent the weekend in Lincoln and was talking to some people I know down there, including a former player.
To a man, they said (and I'm not joking) that their biggest concern is that Tanner Lee heads to the draft after this year. 1 of the big reasons was that he was invited to the Manning camp. And they "heard" that he outperformed "that Groff [sic] guy that was drafted this year".