NCAA Football 11 Rankings

[stocker08]

Minnesota looks to be in the middle of the pack this year according to the game. I know this doesn't mean a whole lot, but it is nice to see that we are not as easily tossed aside as some of the "analysts" have done.

http://www.chicitysports.com/forum/gaming-forum/1849-ncaa-football-11-team-ratings.html

School - Overall - Offense - Defense

Ohio State - A, A+, A
Penn State - A-, A, B+
Wisconsin - A-, A, B+
Nebraska - B+, A-, B+
Iowa - B+, A-, B+
Michigan - B, B+, B
Michigan State - B, B+, B
Minnesota - B, B, B
Northwestern - B-, B-, B
Purdue - B-, B, B-
Indiana - B-, B, C+
Illinois - C+, C+, C+

 

[frozengopher]

EA has always been pretty impartial in their rankings, the Gophs have never been rated ridiculously poorly. Even after 1-11 we were still ranked around a C+ for the following year. It will be interesting how they rate our positional players.

 

[Rosemountian]

Those rankings are misleading compared to real life though. A. Weber will be a 90+ rated QB just because he is a four year starter. M. Gray will be a 80+ rated recruit because he was ranked so high in recruiting. D Bennett was a 80 something with 90 speed back, and Eskridge....that is a legit starter for a Big Ten team in that game...I am not sure if either is a legit starter in real life.

The game, like many people, overrate experience.