NCAA approves ‘five-for-five’ age-based eligibility model

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
64,624
Reaction score
23,997
Points
113
In a move that gives more flexibility to student-athletes and streamlines regulations, the NCAA Division I Cabinet on Tuesday approved its “five-for-five” plan, an age-based eligibility model, in which an athlete will receive five years of eligibility — up from the traditional four years — to be used in five years.
The Cabinet’s decision is not final until its meeting concludes Wednesday.

It’s the latest move by the NCAA, under pressure because of repeated losses in the courtroom, to give student-athletes more freedom. The plan follows the relaxing of transfer rules and the approval of name, image and likeness payments over the past decade.

Under the “five-for-five” plan:

*Student-athletes would have five years of eligibility that can be used in a continuous five-year period. This replaces the current model in which student-athletes have four years of eligibility to be completed over a five-year period.

*The practice of redshirting, or athletes sitting out a full season upon enrollment or playing in fewer games than a designated limit to preserve a year of eligibility, no longer will exist. For the most part, the NCAA no longer will grant medical or hardship waivers to preserve a year of eligibility. There will be limited waivers for particular circumstances such as military service, religious missions and for athletes who become pregnant.

*The five-year period for athletes to complete their eligibility begins upon initial full-time enrollment in any college or at the start of the academic year immediately following their 19th birthday, whichever is earlier.
The changes will begin with the 2026-27 season and apply to 2026 high school graduates. Athletes who completed their four years of eligibility in the 2025-26 season would receive no additional eligibility. Athletes who are enrolled and have eligibility remaining after the 2025-26 school year will have the ability to gain eligibility under the “five-for-five” plan or to continue under the previous rules, whichever is more beneficial to the athlete. Any waivers pertaining to eligibility under current rules must be submitted by schools and conferences by July 31.


Go Gophers!!
 




This probably helps teams like the Gophers, on balance.

More of our roster is comprised of guys who the NFL isn't dying to draft after 3 or 4 years. There's transfers in both directions but we have more guys who would use 5 college years, overall.

Helps the Gophers build an older and more mature team that it hopefully can use to better compete with teams like Ohio State who nab all the top high school recruits.

It's like Gopher Hockey (where we have all the young 1st rounders and lose to 23 and 24 year olds) but in reverse
 


This probably helps teams like the Gophers, on balance.

More of our roster is comprised of guys who the NFL isn't dying to draft after 3 or 4 years. There's transfers in both directions but we have more guys who would use 5 college years, overall.

Helps the Gophers build an older and more mature team that it hopefully can use to better compete with teams like Ohio State who nab all the top high school recruits.

It's like Gopher Hockey (where we have all the young 1st rounders and lose to 23 and 24 year olds) but in reverse
Yep, this will likely help the non-blue bloods more than the blue bloods. It will mean more talent overall in college football. The top teams area already loaded with lots of talent, so the excess will trickle down the line.

Think of QB especially, those guys want to play and most aren't willing to wait like Manning did at Texas.
 

Yep, this will likely help the non-blue bloods more than the blue bloods. It will mean more talent overall in college football. The top teams area already loaded with lots of talent, so the excess will trickle down the line.

Think of QB especially, those guys want to play and most aren't willing to wait like Manning did at Texas.

I think recruiting class sizes would end up being smaller, too. If they don't enlarge the number of scholarships and now we're dividing by 5 instead of 4 (or 4.5ish with redshirts), then teams will probably take a few less HS players. Meaning HS talent trickles down to anyone who didn't have their pick of the litter.

Those couple extra 4* guys Ohio State or Michigan would have taken before maybe end up at Minnesota.
 


I’m not so sure it’ll help the gophers and the like any more than any other.

What’s the dollar amount? You’ll still see guys leave and go elsewhere at the top end via the portal. We’ll take some guys back from the top end and pluck the G5 guys the same as we have to this point

This isn’t going to change much for most colleges in football given teams were just selective on games to not burn their RS year while playing 4 games. A couple random guys with one extra year who are right on the fringe of the nfl are not going to take your team over the top

I just like it ends the medical rs shit and juco not counting. Something I’ll be super interested in is what happens with prep schools post grad given its 19
 






I think this would give another year of legit eligibility to Darius Taylor, Greg Johnson, John Nestor, Noah Jennings, and TJ Bush.

Not sure how many will or won't use it, but they will have the option.
 



I think this would give another year of legit eligibility to Darius Taylor, Greg Johnson, John Nestor, Noah Jennings, and TJ Bush.

Not sure how many will or won't use it, but they will have the option.
I suppose if a player is projected to go high in the draft, he goes. If he is not, why not come back and try help his draft stock. I would think Greg Johnson will evaluate that once the season is over. With the history of injuries, I could see DT decide to enter the draft especially if he has a decent season. But Jennings, Bush and Nestor might benefit with another year. And if Greg Johnson does not project to go early, maybe he does also. It will be interesting. I think this rule benefits programs like Minnesota. Fleck does, too.
 

I think this would give another year of legit eligibility to Darius Taylor, Greg Johnson, John Nestor, Noah Jennings, and TJ Bush.

Not sure how many will or won't use it, but they will have the option.
One angle I haven't seen mentioned is that fifth-year guys (especially at the non-skills positions) will probably be hot items in the portal. Experience--especially at the P4 level--is a valuable commodity and you may see helmet schools dish out considerable NIL for them.
 

The five-year period for athletes to complete their eligibility begins upon initial full-time enrollment in any college or at the start of the academic year immediately following their 19th birthday, whichever is earlier.
Does this mean the days of 28 year old Australian punters is gone?
 

I’m not so sure it’ll help the gophers and the like any more than any other.

What’s the dollar amount? You’ll still see guys leave and go elsewhere at the top end via the portal. We’ll take some guys back from the top end and pluck the G5 guys the same as we have to this point

This isn’t going to change much for most colleges in football given teams were just selective on games to not burn their RS year while playing 4 games. A couple random guys with one extra year who are right on the fringe of the nfl are not going to take your team over the top

I just like it ends the medical rs shit and juco not counting. Something I’ll be super interested in is what happens with prep schools post grad given its 19
There are a lot of really good college players that get drafted very late or even not at all. Ivan Pace was an All American. QBs Pavia and Altmyer were certainly players that had big impacts on their college teams. Big Ten 2nd team All Conference tackle Isaiah World went undrafted after getting hurt in Oregon's playoff game. He might have come back for one more season under the new rules.

I also think the new rules will help with depth at programs like Minnesota. The more talent overall available, the better the backups will be.
 
Last edited:

Does this mean the days of 28 year old Australian punters is gone?

Probably, unless they were also Mormon and served time in the Australian military.
 

Does this mean the days of 28 year old Australian punters is gone?
The way the rule is worded seems odd to me. If you haven't enrolled in school, what does it matter if you're 18 or 30? The rule now basically prohibits the Mark Crawfords of the world. I didn't think that was that big of an issue it needed resolving.
 

The way the rule is worded seems odd to me. If you haven't enrolled in school, what does it matter if you're 18 or 30? The rule now basically prohibits the Mark Crawfords of the world. I didn't think that was that big of an issue it needed resolving.

The age 19 limit is weeding out those going to JUCOs/NAIA and then saying they still get 4 additional seasons at an NCAA institution.
 

The way the rule is worded seems odd to me. If you haven't enrolled in school, what does it matter if you're 18 or 30? The rule now basically prohibits the Mark Crawfords of the world. I didn't think that was that big of an issue it needed resolving.
They don't want those foreigners taking our jobs anymore.
 

*The practice of redshirting, or athletes sitting out a full season upon enrollment or playing in fewer games than a designated limit to preserve a year of eligibility, no longer will exist. For the most part, the NCAA no longer will grant medical or hardship waivers to preserve a year of eligibility. There will be limited waivers for particular circumstances such as military service, religious missions and for athletes who become pregnant.
In principle, this seems like a good change. I was in favor of the "5 years to play 4", with no exceptions, but this is reasonably close enough. However, I'll believe the bolded when I see it. The "hardship waivers" were such a scam, and the NCAA has no backbone that how long is it going to take until a school like UNC (in basketball) or Ohio State (in football) want a 24-year old guy from some mid major to come and be a hired assassin for a year before they grant a hardship waiver? If they actually stick to their guns and don't have exceptions, this is a great rule, but again, I'll believe that when I see it.
 



The age 19 limit is weeding out those going to JUCOs/NAIA and then saying they still get 4 additional seasons at an NCAA institution.
Not to mention that it will weed out 25 year old Canadian Junior hockey players as well.
But the Aussie punter thing immediately came to my mind as well.
 




Top Bottom