NCAA approves ‘five-for-five’ age-based eligibility model

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
64,626
Reaction score
23,997
Points
113
In a move that gives more flexibility to student-athletes and streamlines regulations, the NCAA Division I Cabinet on Tuesday approved its “five-for-five” plan, an age-based eligibility model, in which an athlete will receive five years of eligibility — up from the traditional four years — to be used in five years.
The Cabinet’s decision is not final until its meeting concludes Wednesday.

It’s the latest move by the NCAA, under pressure because of repeated losses in the courtroom, to give student-athletes more freedom. The plan follows the relaxing of transfer rules and the approval of name, image and likeness payments over the past decade.

Under the “five-for-five” plan:

*Student-athletes would have five years of eligibility that can be used in a continuous five-year period. This replaces the current model in which student-athletes have four years of eligibility to be completed over a five-year period.

*The practice of redshirting, or athletes sitting out a full season upon enrollment or playing in fewer games than a designated limit to preserve a year of eligibility, no longer will exist. For the most part, the NCAA no longer will grant medical or hardship waivers to preserve a year of eligibility. There will be limited waivers for particular circumstances such as military service, religious missions and for athletes who become pregnant.

*The five-year period for athletes to complete their eligibility begins upon initial full-time enrollment in any college or at the start of the academic year immediately following their 19th birthday, whichever is earlier.
The changes will begin with the 2026-27 season and apply to 2026 high school graduates. Athletes who completed their four years of eligibility in the 2025-26 season would receive no additional eligibility. Athletes who are enrolled and have eligibility remaining after the 2025-26 school year will have the ability to gain eligibility under the “five-for-five” plan or to continue under the previous rules, whichever is more beneficial to the athlete. Any waivers pertaining to eligibility under current rules must be submitted by schools and conferences by July 31.


Go Gophers!!
 






This seems to set up a two tiered system. With no redshirt, a fairly high number of freshmen will likely end up in lower and mid majors to get playing time where they can then use their production to catapult them to a higher level. The rich schools may not offer as many high school kids since the kids may not get playing time.

Also, remind me how the Jr College system works. Did I read that JC won't contribute at all to the 5 for 5? If so, how many kids will go the JC before they go to 5 for 5 schools?
 

This seems to set up a two tiered system. With no redshirt, a fairly high number of freshmen will likely end up in lower and mid majors to get playing time where they can then use their production to catapult them to a higher level. The rich schools may not offer as many high school kids since the kids may not get playing time.

Also, remind me how the Jr College system works. Did I read that JC won't contribute at all to the 5 for 5? If so, how many kids will go the JC before they go to 5 for 5 schools?
Their clock would start running when they turn 19 and enroll at a DI school, would it not? So maybe they could play JUCO for a year and still get 5 at a DI school, or maybe 2 and 4 depending on how old they are when they graduate HS?
 

Their clock would start running when they turn 19 and enroll at a DI school, would it not? So maybe they could play JUCO for a year and still get 5 at a DI school, or maybe 2 and 4 depending on how old they are when they graduate HS?
From the article, emphasis mine:


“*The five-year period for athletes to complete their eligibility begins upon initial full-time enrollment in any college or at the start of the academic year immediately following their 19th birthday, whichever is earlier.”

I would consider a JuCo a college

But I’m sure someone will file a suit
 

From the article, emphasis mine:


“*The five-year period for athletes to complete their eligibility begins upon initial full-time enrollment in any college or at the start of the academic year immediately following their 19th birthday, whichever is earlier.”

I would consider a JuCo a college

But I’m sure someone will file a suit
Based on this, you are correct sir

1782258699524.jpeg
 






So does this mean including this upcoming year:
Durkin, JCJ and Evans two years to play
Palmer, Asuma, Grove three years to play
Kordel, Grady, Groves, Kai four years to play
Anderson, Mpoyi and Tomes five years to play
Essentially no seniors this year.
 



Based on this it seems like the classification of "Frosh - Soph - Junior - Senior" seems antiquated.

5th Year "Super Senior"? Or just go to:

Year 1 - Year 2 - Year 3 - Year 4 - Year 5
 

Based on this it seems like the classification of "Frosh - Soph - Junior - Senior" seems antiquated.

5th Year "Super Senior"? Or just go to:

Year 1 - Year 2 - Year 3 - Year 4 - Year 5
Year 1: Transfer Candidate
Year 2: Transfer Portal Explorer
Year 3: Transfer Portal Veteran
Year 4: Transfer Portal Mercenary
Year 5: Early Bird Special Enthusiast
 





Top Bottom