He’s one of the worst public speakers I’ve ever heard but perhaps he’s better one on one? In general, my guess is that it’s probably left more to the coaches because he sucks. See PJ doing well in this area and Ben failing.What if fundraising was a requirement for Coyle?
I can attest that Coyle is as miserable one on one as he is as a public speaker.He’s one of the worst public speakers I’ve ever heard but perhaps he’s better one on one? In general, my guess is that it’s probably left more to the coaches because he sucks. See PJ doing well in this area and Ben failing.
Plus, wasn't Lou Nanne supposed to be helping out on the fund-raising front? (especially during the time the Athletes Village was built)I can attest that Coyle is as miserable one on one as he is as a public speaker.
And speaking of money raising skills, we still have a deficit on Athletes Village....and how long has Coyle been here?
What's the rate on the Athletes Village loan?I can attest that Coyle is as miserable one on one as he is as a public speaker.
And speaking of money raising skills, we still have a deficit on Athletes Village....and how long has Coyle been here?
Can we all agree it would be better if it was paid off vs still paying on a loan?What's the rate on the Athletes Village loan?
I see folks bring it up like it's some terrible thing to have a loan or something ... that's not how it works.
No .... if you have X amount of dollars and you could pay down a loan, or use it elsewhere, using it elsewhere may in fact be the right choice.Can we all agree it would be better if it was paid off vs still paying on a loan?
We are not arguing the same thing. The rest of us are saying if we had fundraisers that could get say, General Mills, to give us $50 million to pay off the athletes village that is better than not going out and getting donations. It's like you are arguing it's better for me to take out a loan on a car than have my rich uncle buy it for me.No .... if you have X amount of dollars and you could pay down a loan, or use it elsewhere, using it elsewhere may in fact be the right choice.
![]()
Opportunity Cost: Definition, Formula, and Examples
Opportunity cost is the potential forgone profit from a missed opportunity—the result of choosing one alternative over another.www.investopedia.com
I think that argument is ... absurd / magical thinking.We are not arguing the same thing. The rest of us are saying if we had fundraisers that could get say, General Mills, to give us $50 million to pay off the athletes village that is better than not going out and getting donations. It's like you are arguing it's better for me to take out a loan on a car than have my rich uncle buy it for me.
So just throw your hands up in the air and not try? Fundraising is pointless?I think that argument is ... absurd / magical thinking.
This idea that "well if you just get $50 million" ... what is that?
Why not just get $100 million, $200 million? If that's a thing you just do, why not do that? Why doesn't everyone do that?
![]()
I’m not sure they run the U like a private company that analyzes whether they can get a higher return on their money somewhere else than they would by paying off a loan. As long as we’re servicing debt on the athletes Village, that’s taking money away from somewhere else it could be spent; would likely be how the bean counters at the U look at it.What's the rate on the Athletes Village loan?
I see folks bring it up like it's some terrible thing to have a loan or something ... that's not how it works.
Who said nobody tried?So just throw your hands up in the air and not try? Fundraising is pointless?
I've worked with youth sports organizations and that kind of attitude would devastate those programs.
I think the U should exhaust every possible avenue for fundraising. Medved already has proven to be better than Ben in that regard. I would venture to guess someone could do better than Coyle in that regard. It's worth trying.
Worth trying harder or finding someone who is good at it. It could be better. But I don't think you and I will ever agree on that.Who said nobody tried?
Who said they're not trying harder.Worth trying harder or finding someone who is good at it. It could be better. But I don't think you and I will ever agree on that.
I just knew I should not have bought you that car.We are not arguing the same thing. The rest of us are saying if we had fundraisers that could get say, General Mills, to give us $50 million to pay off the athletes village that is better than not going out and getting donations. It's like you are arguing it's better for me to take out a loan on a car than have my rich uncle buy it for me.
I knew it too. I could have gotten such a good rate on the loan!I just knew I should not have bought you that car.
If they aren’t managing finances like that they should be fired. You don’t pay off debt just to be out of debt.I’m not sure they run the U like a private company that analyzes whether they can get a higher return on their money somewhere else than they would by paying off a loan. As long as we’re servicing debt on the athletes Village, that’s taking money away from somewhere else it could be spent; would likely be how the bean counters at the U look at it.
What a mess.Jonathan Smith buyout to leave Michigan State football sliced in half with dismissal of AD
https://sports.yahoo.com/article/jonathan-smith-buyout-leave-michigan-103646321.html?guccounter=1
You seem to have an easy time telling other people how to spend their money and how much and easy that would be.So just throw your hands up in the air and not try? Fundraising is pointless?
I've worked with youth sports organizations and that kind of attitude would devastate those programs.
I think the U should exhaust every possible avenue for fundraising. Medved already has proven to be better than Ben in that regard. I would venture to guess someone could do better than Coyle in that regard. It's worth trying.
The loan is from the university itself. Pretty sure any interest is minimal and matters little.I’m not sure they run the U like a private company that analyzes whether they can get a higher return on their money somewhere else than they would by paying off a loan. As long as we’re servicing debt on the athletes Village, that’s taking money away from somewhere else it could be spent; would likely be how the bean counters at the U look at it.
Then just treat it like the national debt. Move on, and don't worry about it.The loan is from the university itself. Pretty sure any interest is minimal and matters little.
I have.Then just treat it like the national debt. Move on, and don't worry about it.
Very interesting article. The firing of Haller as AD reduced the football coach's (Smith's) buyout by 50%. Actual numbers? Smith's contract buyout declines from a shockingly low $6M to a miniscule $3M (dead man walking ...). By comparison, Luke Fickell's buyout number at Wisconsin is a little over $40M, and PJ's buyout (pegged at 65% of salary, supplemental comp and retention bonus) was at $26.9M duding 2024 season and grows with each contract extension at higher pay.Jonathan Smith buyout to leave Michigan State football sliced in half with dismissal of AD
https://sports.yahoo.com/article/jonathan-smith-buyout-leave-michigan-103646321.html?guccounter=1
And what makes you think Coyle is the reason no one is donating? Could it be that General Mills has no reason to donate?We are not arguing the same thing. The rest of us are saying if we had fundraisers that could get say, General Mills, to give us $50 million to pay off the athletes village that is better than not going out and getting donations. It's like you are arguing it's better for me to take out a loan on a car than have my rich uncle buy it for me.
You mean like how Coyle replaced Teague?Worth trying harder or finding someone who is good at it. It could be better. But I don't think you and I will ever agree on that.