I'd say Kansas City is divided between Kansas, Kansas State, Missouri, and Nebraska. St. Louis is divided by Nebraska, Missouri, and Illinois (and probably alot of Notre Dame). I'd say by adding Nebraska makes the addition of Missouri a moot point.
Whats the deal with Missouri not getting any interest in expansion? Seems like they would be a perfect fit plus they have big time markets in St. Louis and Kansas City.
I'd say Kansas City is divided between Kansas, Kansas State, Missouri, and Nebraska. St. Louis is divided by Nebraska, Missouri, and Illinois (and probably alot of Notre Dame). I'd say by adding Nebraska makes the addition of Missouri a moot point.
I am sure I missed this somewhere during these expansion rumors, but why isn't Kansas even being discussed (or was even being discussed) as an option? I can't imagine Mizzou being a better fit than KU. After all, KU brings a part of Kansas City (and St. Louis) and has a recognizable national brand in basketball.
This is about football, that's why. Also, I think they don't cut the mustard academically enough for the Big Ten presidents.
Except St. Louis has a) as many pro teams as us
Except St. Louis has about the same interest in Mizzou as the cities do in us.
Mizzou and KU are both AAU universities (invitation only membership), they cut the mustard. http://www.aau.edu/about/article.aspx?id=5476
Too bad they cant kick teams out of the B10 when they add some. But I can see the issues doing that...