Edit: Clicked the link, those picks are based on the point spread of -15. So makes sense, doubt anyone would pick Illinois to win straightup but can totally see picking them to cover the spread.
Yep, picking Illinois with that spread makes sense because our style of play doesn't always lend itself to winning big. I'm not a gambler so I could care less about what we do against the spread as long as we get the W.We've beaten the spread handily four weeks in a row. The record for the season against the spread is 5-2-1. The 2 losses of course are against the MAC teams; we're 5-0-1 against P5 teams. Sooner or later we're going to fail to beat the spread. This one is by far the largest we've had going our way in a P5 game so it's a fair candidate to break the streak.
Past 4 games from DoA:Dinks of Akron has Illinois winning 28-27
I assume it’s a schtick?Past 4 games from DoA:
Picked NW 31-21
Picked Purdue 21-17
Picked Nebraska 31-28
Picked Maryland 31-28
King Dink.
At this point it's gotta be.I assume it’s a schtick?
I don't think so. They lay out their reasoning, so if they're working a bit...they should stop, they are not very good at it:At this point it's gotta be.
Based on that, I think it is awesome that they picked against us as it seems to be working out well for us when they do. You would think being wrong 4 weeks in a row might change their opinion on us.Past 4 games from DoA:
Picked NW 31-21
Picked Purdue 21-17
Picked Nebraska 31-28
Picked Maryland 31-28
King Dink.
And I think ZoA used to be a poster here. At least I remember a poster that went by zipsofakron. And what are the chances that there are two of them out there?Based on that, I think it is awesome that they picked against us as it seems to be working out well for us when they do. You would think being wrong 4 weeks in a row might change their opinion on us.
Dinks of Akron. That just made me laugh.Past 4 games from DoA:
Picked NW 31-21
Picked Purdue 21-17
Picked Nebraska 31-28
Picked Maryland 31-28
King Dink.