BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 63,930
- Reaction score
- 22,535
- Points
- 113
Go Gophers!!
Rossi?Why in the world would he want to go there over here, if he's leaving the NFL?
$$$$$Why in the world would he want to go there over here, if he's leaving the NFL?
And growingIt just seems to me that the evidence of poor pay and/or atmosphere for assistants at MN is overwhelming
And probably the writing is on the wall at Arizona with how putrid their team has been this yearWhy in the world would he want to go there over here, if he's leaving the NFL?
Way down on the list. The guy has been around Fleck's program for a decade and has been heavily involved in the defense for 1/2 of those years.I think the main problem is a lack of faith in Danny Collins as DC. His story is great and inspiring, but being inspirational isn't the same as being qualified to coordinate a Big Ten defense. Even with talented assistants, the team needs the DC to be the strong leader who sets the tone and defensive philosophy for the whole unit.
I also think we'd see a mass exodus of top defensive players if that were the case.Way down on the list. The guy has been around Fleck's program for a decade and has been heavily involved in the defense for 1/2 of those years.
What did you see this year that shows he is not a leader? He'd be fired already if Fleck didn't think he could lead. They were middle of the pack and were really young at CB's. Run defense was top 1/2 of the league and right behind Iowa. Pass defense struggles with Williams and Nestor missing time. They were #2 in Sacks (5 of 35 from DT's). I'll take that in year #1 for him.
The DL coach obviously did not fit in and our DT's struggled throughout the season. If your DT's struggle, your defense is going to struggle.
So far two walk-ons have left the defense.I also think we'd see a mass exodus of top defensive players if that were the case.
3. Winston wasn't interested$$$ is still bigger at MSU. For me it's
1. Money
2. Fleck wasn't interested.
I don't know if I'm excited about either of those scenarios.
Perhaps.It just seems to me that the evidence of poor pay and/or atmosphere for assistants at MN is overwhelming
i think people would say the warts this year were a big step back, and that's fairWay down on the list. The guy has been around Fleck's program for a decade and has been heavily involved in the defense for 1/2 of those years.
What did you see this year that shows he is not a leader? He'd be fired already if Fleck didn't think he could lead. They were middle of the pack and were really young at CB's. Run defense was top 1/2 of the league and right behind Iowa. Pass defense struggles with Williams and Nestor missing time. They were #2 in Sacks (5 of 35 from DT's). I'll take that in year #1 for him.
The DL coach obviously did not fit in and our DT's struggled throughout the season. If your DT's struggle, your defense is going to struggle.
Sure, if your books are along the lines of what a $150,000 accountant normally does, then both can do them equally well.Not convinced assistant coaches make much of a difference.
Akin to a $1,000,000/year accountant vs. a $150,000 one. You'd likely get the same result if they both did your books.
Glen Mason would hire new defensive coordinators to do exactly this all the time. I don't ever recall us having a better defense because of it.IMHO, that is why defenses that are having trouble often step back and "simplify" assignments.
Then you’ve never been in a locker room or on a team that has changed coaches can be a huge difference between one and the other.Not convinced assistant coaches make much of a difference.
Akin to a $1,000,000/year accountant vs. a $150,000 one. You'd likely get the same result if they both did your books.
His best DC was his first, David Gibbs, who came with him from Kansas. Defense was 8th in nation in 1999 and a year later he left for the Denver Broncos as a Safeties coach where his dad was the OL coach. He had been a journeyman since. Rossi was longest tenured DC since.Glen Mason would hire new defensive coordinators to do exactly this all the time. I don't ever recall us having a better defense because of it.
If you simplify the assignments, you make it easier on the offense to pick you apart. Yeah, you give up less explosive plays in exchange for watching your defense give up 5-10 yard completions all game long.
I'd rather go down trying to play modern defensive football.
I liked Gibbs as he seemed happy to go crazy and roll the dice / stack the box and dare folks to throw.His best DC was his first, David Gibbs, who came with him from Kansas. Defense was 8th in nation in 1999 and a year later he left for the Denver Broncos as a Safeties coach where his dad was the OL coach. He had been a journeyman since. Rossi was longest tenured DC since.
It’s one of our biggest problems to solve. Players play for their position coach, who recruited them. Turnover hurts us.It just seems to me that the evidence of poor pay and/or atmosphere for assistants at MN is overwhelming
Your position coach makes a big difference IMO. Not just football knowledge but building close relationships. Usually a player spends more time with their position coach than any other coach.Not convinced assistant coaches make much of a difference.
Akin to a $1,000,000/year accountant vs. a $150,000 one. You'd likely get the same result if they both did your books.
Tyrone Carter and Willie Middlebrooks certainly helped with that strategy.I liked Gibbs as he seemed happy to go crazy and roll the dice / stack the box and dare folks to throw.
Granted he had Tyrone Carter back there to clean up after that kinda play. Very much roll of the dice defensive system. If TC isn't back there I think things would have been very different.