goldengophers
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2009
- Messages
- 3,623
- Reaction score
- 2,058
- Points
- 113
Your premise that UNC could've/would've accepted $0 as of Dec 6th, 2010 is faulty and makes your arguement null in void.That's what I'm asking. What was the reasoning behind it.
One of Maturi's most major faults was his inability to make bold decisions and act with directness. You bet he would have cancelled it if there was no buyout. I'd bet he didn't want to make any decisions before the new AD came in. Either way it would be good to know if the delay upped or caused the buyout amount.
What a #%$ storm this whole deal is though. Whoever leaked that tidbit should be fired.