year of the gopher
Section 117, Row 4
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Messages
- 1,405
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 38
Ooh, you caught me. I must have just made it all up.Everything you say might be true but how would we know because you didn't cite any sources. Furthermore, if you think only a small percentage of high school students and their parents rely on the US News and World Report you are mistaken. Whatever the reality the U's national reputation is extremely mediocre. But it doesn't matter anyway because the U has reached its high water mark as an academic institution. The Republicans in control of the State Legislature hate the people who run the U and they are going to make them pay one way or the other.
http://www.academic.umn.edu/provost/awards/rankings.html
http://www.arwu.org/ARWU2010.jsp
I think that a very small percentage of students and their parents place significant emphasis on US News. They may look at it very generally, but god help the families that make it a major part of the process of one of the biggest decisions in their childrens' lives. The criteria are arbitrary and the rankings of questionable value. Here are a couple good reads on the topic: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0109.graham.thompson.html
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1316/is_9_32/ai_65160614/
As noted by many others on this board, the national and international reputation of the U is very, very good. Sometimes I wonder if it's better other places than it is here (that whole Minnesota humbleness thing). I think we should do a lot more than we do to talk about the U's past and present achievements.
What has hurt the U in rankings like US News is undergrad graduation rates, which have been improving (not enough, but some). There's a lot of complexity that goes into the graduation rate at a place like the U that I won't bother getting into here, but suffice it to say that's the big one that brings the U to #64 in the eyes of US News.