Well there is a lot of baloney to sort through in that post - mixed in with some bits of whole grain truth.
First off, Pitino is not playing mindless run and gun basketball. I do think he wants players to take the first good open look and also get any opportunities they can off of turnovers or getting the ball up the court quicker. Iowa has done this, Michigan State does it whenever it can and certainly Indiana does it. So the idea that no one else does these things successfully in the Big Ten is just wrong.
With the players that Pitino was handed (and I don't want to go down the Tubby road but you asked for it) he did far better his first year than what I would have expected Tubby to do with what we would have had. Consider a team last year without Matheui or King and add back in Foster and Ellis. As rough as Matheui has had it this year he was terrific last year. So for you to say that he took the program "down the ladder" is wrong. This year has been disappointing to say the least and part of that is on Pitino.
Certainly this year has brought echos of the Monson era to some. Monson was not a bad coach but also not a great recruiter. He had an uptempo system but couldn't quite put the bodies on the floor to run it. Pitino is having a tough time but we do have the appearances of a good recruiting class incoming. I think you have to wait for that. By the way - Clem was not a run and gun coach by any means but once he got the horses - they ran plenty in 1996-97. Pitino will have to get the horses or he will fail. Now is way to early to call it. Other than the erased Clem championship you have to go back to the '81 Dutcher squad to find any great history and beyond that more trouble under Mussy.