Bayfieldgopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 9,143
- Reaction score
- 1,655
- Points
- 113
If the only comparison is a desire to run the ball, Kill could be compared to many coaches. But to compare Kill to Mason is faulty on several levels. Mason saw the program as all about him, Kill sees the program as being all about Minnesota. Mason turned off the Minnesota High School Coaches, Kill embraced them as being one of them. Mason saw top talent leave the state, Kill has stemmed that. You can bet your letter of intent if Mason was Coaching, Jonah Persig would be in Columbus. Strength and Conditioning was a buzz word for Coach Mason, Coach Kill has brought it front and center as necessity for success. Coach Mason was consistently out coached, made few adjustments, had few tactics or tweaks to get a key first down or stop an opponent. Coach Kill has show the ability to do all that Mason was unable to. There is no legitimate comparsion between these two Coaches.
I totally agree with Husker on his points but its to early to support the bold part. Mason had his teams well prepared for many contests but was not able to muster up or change things well before or during crunch time to get some key W's. We will learn more about Coach Kills ability in these areas.