Why the pessimism and eagerness to forfeit games a whole two, three, or four years before we ever take the field against Nebraska? Of course, there's a lot I don't understand about my Minnesota neighbors.
Big12 1996
Texas wins south with 6-2 record. Nebraska wins the north at 8-0 followed by COlorado at 7-1 and K-State at 6-2. Texas wins the Big12 Championship 37-27
SEC 2001
LSU ties in the west with 5-3 record, UT wins East outright with 7-1 record (ahead of FLorida with 6-2 record). LSU wins SEC Championship 31-20.
MAC 2001
Toledo wins west with 5-2 record. Marshall wins east with 8-0 record followed by Miami with 7-1. TOledo wins MAC Championship 41-36.
Big12 2003
K-State wins north with 6-2 record. OU wins south with 8-0 record followed by Texas at 7-1. K-State wins Big12 Championship 35-7.
SEC 2005
Georgia wins east with 6-2 record. LSU and Auburn tied for the west at 7-1 with Bama close behind at 6-2. Georgia wins SEC Championship over LSU 34-14.
MAC 2008
Buffalo wins east with 5-3 record. Ball State wins west with 8-0 record followed by Central Michigan and Western Michigan with 6-2 record. Buffalo wins MAC Championship 42-24.
Texas, LSU, and Georgia are perrenial powerhouse every year. I wouldnt call them a decent team at all. especially with a 6-2 record. K-state was not a decent team in '03. I recall them being a good team that year with Sproals and Roberson at RB and QB. I take Buffalo and Toledo out because the MAC is terrible. BIG 10, PAC 10, SEC, and old BIG 12 are way different then the MAC or WAC or Moutain West. I will say your best example is the LSU because they were 5-3 in the conference and beat a 7-1 Florida team
We aren't just talking about splitting into two divisions. We are talking about splitting into two divisions AND adding a team that is better than the Gophers.
Way back in ancient history, there was an American League and a National League. Then, in 1969 the American League was split into the American League East, and the American League West (this is before the AL Central for you youngins).
This undoubtedly INCREASED the chances of the Twins going to the World Series because they didn't have to beat the Yankees over the course of an entire season to get there (a la 87 and 91).
However, this isn't the correct analogy for what's happening in the Big Ten. What if, when splitting the American League into East and West baseball had simultaneously ADDED another team just as good as the Yankees and put them in the American League West? Would the Twins chances have gone up in that case? In this scenario they would have to beat Yankees II over an entire season AND beat Yankees I in a seven game championship series. It's difficult to quantify the exact impact, but my guess is it gets MUCH HARDER for the Twins in that scenario.
Now I know Nebraska ain't the Yankees, but they ARE better than the Gophers and gain the most from joining the Big Ten. Hence I gotta believe this makes it quite a bit harder for the Gophers.
All the examples I cited are teams that were 3rd best teams (or lower) winning their conference championship game. Just cause you don't like the results doesn't mean you can dismiss it.