CentralGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2009
- Messages
- 3,259
- Reaction score
- 1,481
- Points
- 113
[emoji35]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think that not only does this team get into the NCAA's but they get in as no worse than a 4 seed. Carr can use this to his advantage and by the end have a masters degree like so many others do at other programs. Disappointed but the roster is loaded .
A sig. part of these waiver's are the applicant's academic progress and achievement. Speculating, but I'm guessing something academic held up the decision; and ultimately resulted in the denial.
Mark Smith was given the waiver after his transfer to Missouri. He left due to playing time. Carr’s situation involved a coach being fired and he doesn’t get it? The NCAA continues to find ways to make them look stupid.
A sig. part of these waiver's are the applicant's academic progress and achievement. Speculating, but I'm guessing something academic held up the decision; and ultimately resulted in the denial.
Lazy ass, stereotypical bull****. I’d claim something else but I don’t know you.
Dude was all acc accademics last year.
I've got some maroon colored glasses too but haven't seen any news outlets or college bball sources project us in the ncaa's.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I've got some maroon colored glasses too but haven't seen any news outlets or college bball sources project us in the ncaa's.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mark Smith was given the waiver after his transfer to Missouri. He left due to playing time. Carr’s situation involved a coach being fired and he doesn’t get it? The NCAA continues to find ways to make them look stupid.
Looks like someone at Pitt got a wild hair up their rear in regards to this kid and called in favors to get his waiver sacked. Seems "House of Cards"-ish I know, but that's politics and just would not surprise me. My guess
Looks like someone at Pitt got a wild hair up their rear in regards to this kid and called in favors to get his waiver sacked. Seems "House of Cards"-ish I know, but that's politics and just would not surprise me. My guess
I’ve seen several people comment about Pitt having something to do with the denial. How would they have anything to do with this?
I’ve seen several people comment about Pitt having something to do with the denial. How would they have anything to do with this?
I don't really know, but there was talk that the reason Mark Smith was approved for immediate eligibility (no sick relative, no coaching change, not going closer to home, AND Illinois plays Missouri every year) was because Brad Underwood allowed it. Carr tweeted out a note earlier this evening, though it looks like it was deleted, about how he had built up a relationship with former Pitt coach Kevin Stallings over the two years of being recruited and eventually playing there, and said something about it being a toxic situation there after the firing, that it was emotionally taxing for him or something, maybe arguing that leaving Pitt was in the best interest of his mental well-being. Maybe Pitt/Jeff Capel are disputing the legitimacy of that claim, and thus the NCAA is hesitant about allowing him to play without sitting out.
Speculation dude. Can't you read? If you're implying it was some sort of racial commentary on my part, you are a moron.
Still kind of a crappy thing to publicly speculate about a kid, that he has academic issues. Especially when the kid has won academic honors and had an offer from Vanderbilt.
Might have been better to lay off the speculation.
Speculation dude. Can't you read? If you're implying it was some sort of racial commentary on my part, you are a moron.
1. Brock Stull averaged 13 points a game playing over 30 minutes a game the past two years playing against solid D1 competition. When we got him, some people had him pegged starting OVER Dupree. Now, after 1 game, it's like he's viewed on a level with Brady Rudrud or Hunt Conroy. I don't get it.
2. I never said they were a "lock", but the OP said that WITH Carr, we had a "decent chance" just to make the NCAA. That's ludicrous.
If Curry comes back fine, we have our deepest team since the Haskins years. Even if he doesn't, this is a deeper team than we have had in a decade.
The fact that you think this team is a lock to get to the tournament is what's wild.
I'm surprised, too, at the harshness of the response to what I posted. Either these people are insecure about how good the Gophers are, or I'm way off in my assessment of their chances (I'd classify them as an NCAA hopeful).
The Gophers have some quality players on this roster and may make the NCAA tournament. With that being said, they would be better with Carr. That was clear to anyone that attended the recent intrasquad scrimmage. I cringed when I read that Pitino was optimistic - typically bad news follows. It will be interesting to see if the appeal is successful. This team with strong guard play and a healthy Curry could be very good.