Am I sure in two years there won’t be anymore players with 6-7 years of eligibility due to Covid? Yes.You sure about this. Minnesota has benefitted more than anyone else with players getting extra covid years.
Am I sure in two years there won’t be anymore players with 6-7 years of eligibility due to Covid? Yes.You sure about this. Minnesota has benefitted more than anyone else with players getting extra covid years.
Yes no other generation ever thought that before!
(I mean sure that is demonstrably false but hey old guys blaming the youth is beyond cliche)
I get the argument and agree that what's fair for the coaches should also be fair for the players in terms coming and going.Remember: an undergraduate player is only allowed one transfer prior to having earned a college degree. Once the special “covid” free extra year has disappeared, there will be very few 6 or potentially even seven year college players.
Welcome to the era where college athletes are placed on a bit more of equal opportunity with the 3 to 10 million dollar head coaches, assistant coaches and the sec & bt network type colleges & universities earning ALL that money from their conference negotiated tv contracts.
Remember: the players ARE the game that is sold to cable, streaming and tv networks. In essence, the coaches, universities, media outlets that monetize the advertising money, the gambling industry and the gambling hungry fans who demand that every game must be televised so that every form of gambling is available in every home, bar and location all the time.
Perhaps a few benefits like a one time undergraduate free transfer portal and a NIL system made available to the REAL driving force of college: the players will become a very healthy and good thing in the next decade. This is evolving. It will most likely settle into a decent system.
We fans can just get used to the fact that that college athletes have rights and a right to share in the wealth that being the most visible force in an industry that is highly valued by fans, universities, advertisers, high profile coaches, multi-media providers, gambling outlets, gamblers and sports agents coaches, and, Gopherhole folks even you and I, gives these college football players and stars and recruits and depth position players in the year 2022 and beyond.
This is America and the American dream in action! The players are the game. This is how it is.
God help me, but I do love college football!!!
If 1 and 3 players transfer on every team. My passion for the Gophers and college football will be over.This is going to end up like Club Volleyball or AAU, coaches scrambling to keep players and a third of roster turnover every year. This will mitigate the importance of HS recruiting and poaching will be an all time high. The staff's that know how to adapt to play this new recruiting game will be the one's that thrive.
Go Gophers!!
I get the argument and agree that what's fair for the coaches should also be fair for the players in terms coming and going.
But as far a "the players are the game", I disagree with the sentiment. For many, if not most fans, were it not for the alma mater/local element, they'd rather spend their time an money watching the best players compete in the NFL as opposed to still developing kids from some other state.
How much interest and money do you see in semi-pro football? So it's a two way street as far as not having a game without the players, but also having no fan interest or promotion without the universities and and the alumni who care most about the places and the colors on the front of the uniforms.
Not many people work 80 hour weeks but sure.So, like any professional career.
The presidents have absolutely messed this up by allowing this. The supposed primary purpose is to get these kids an education and a degree. So many of these transfers will never achieve that. They need to go back to 1 year sit out on a transfer.Anyone in favor of what this transfer nonsense has done to college football is a moron. Thanks for doing your part to destroy a great sport.
The portal tends to match players to their proper level. It will also correct recruiting errors.the roster churn is going to hit mid-level programs the hardest.
the helmet schools might lose a few good players, but mostly will lose guys who are buried on the depth chart and are moving "down" in search of playing time.
and the lower-level programs will lose kids who think they have a shot to move up and showcase themselves for a shot at the pros.
but a program in the middle will lose kids in both directions.
throw NIL into the mix and it's going to make roster management very difficult.
Elite talents want to play on high profile championship teams to maximize draft potential. But the vast majority of college athletes want to play and compete on game day. The portal is a great vehicle for guys to find playing time by moving down or sideways to teams needing their skills.The problem is society today. If you don't get what you want and "think" you deserve, you blame someone or something, then go somewhere else.
Some of these kids are so brainwashed and alpha it is terrible. Tons of Uncle Rico's are being created every year.
You don't want disgruntled players taking up scholarships.Wonder the % of players entering the portal are
Disgruntled
Looking for NIL $
Coach leaving the program
Playing time
Scholastic
Recruited by another school
What is charming about having players hang around five years and not play much or ever? More interesting to exchange them for new guys with potential to contribute.It already has begun the shift to being minor league football. It's just going to keep heading that way. The charm is quickly eroding.
This strikes me as highly aspirational.With the college players gaining more local public exposure through nil events, the college players will be more readily recognizable around the university campus, the city is located in, and will allow the recruits, quarterbacks, running backs, receivers, star defenders, linemen,
hoops players, volleyball players, women’s hoops players, softball players, baseball players and men and women hockey players much more exposure to the local and state fans.
So many of these “kids” have remarkable personalities and communications skills that need to be utilized and developed while they are in college.
Why should the head coach and Athletic Director be constantly over exposed and paraded around as the “ face” and “personality” of the University of Minnesota sports teams. Utilize. these talented, energetic, very bright young people be the faces of the various teams they are important members of. let them sharpen and hone their talents and skills to help sell their love for their U of M and their presence in the twin cities?
It is an important part of their development as students at the U of M.
I sometimes don’t think seeing a multimillionaire head coach being the only really visible person on the football team is the ONLY way to go. The players who make or don’t make the plays that win or lose the games equal a very large percentage of the reasons I have spent about 65 years of my life listening to, attending in person and watching Gopher football.
I’m not saying you are wrong. And, perhaps I am the only person who does see the players as such an important part of U of M football.
But watching the college students who play the games is what has always been my chief reason for supporting this team.
This strikes me as highly aspirational.
How do all the non-athletes in college utilize their personalities and communications skill? The head coach has years, often decades of putting in time at lower positions to get to that point and have (hopefully) proven they can handle the enormous responsibilities involved in overseeing all aspects of a program.
And exposure goes both ways. Do you also want your student athletes getting so much of the criticism that a head coach as face of the program takes when things are going poorly? Also how much attention and money do you really believe there is to go around? The baseball and softball players will never get the spotlight that the head football coach and star football players get for obvious reasons that relate to the value the paying audience puts on the entertainment value they get out of watching. If I'm not a hockey fan, why would I have any greater interest in promoting hockey players over the president of the French Club, or the Forensics Team?
I don't think anyone's saying they want or need to see any more of Mark Coyle than neccessary. But the head coaches are on another level than the players for good reason.
Non-athletes in college often times get a great deal of experience developing communications skills, service abilities and make connections with others by working part-time jobs. College athletes really have no ability to enter part-time job markets because of the demands put on them and their time by coaches, conditioners, tutors and year-round classes.This strikes me as highly aspirational.
How do all the non-athletes in college utilize their personalities and communications skill? The head coach has years, often decades of putting in time at lower positions to get to that point and have (hopefully) proven they can handle the enormous responsibilities involved in overseeing all aspects of a program.
And exposure goes both ways. Do you also want your student athletes getting so much of the criticism that a head coach as face of the program takes when things are going poorly? Also how much attention and money do you really believe there is to go around? The baseball and softball players will never get the spotlight that the head football coach and star football players get for obvious reasons that relate to the value the paying audience puts on the entertainment value they get out of watching. If I'm not a hockey fan, why would I have any greater interest in promoting hockey players over the president of the French Club, or the Forensics Team?
I don't think anyone's saying they want or need to see any more of Mark Coyle than neccessary. But the head coaches are on another level than the players for good reason.
I would add another category: Eased Out By CoachWonder the % of players entering the portal are
Disgruntled
Looking for NIL $
Coach leaving the program
Playing time
Scholastic
Recruited by another school
There won't be many 6-7 year eligibility players in two years, but there could still be a few malingerers. Players who entered in the 2020 season get 4 years + 1 Covid year = 5 years. If red-shirted, they get a 6th year. That would take such a player out to the 2025 season. A medical waiver could extend that too the 2026 season, which is the absolute "wall" for 6-7 year players.Am I sure in two years there won’t be anymore players with 6-7 years of eligibility due to Covid? Yes.
Like Mankato St hockey?We're not far away from the first FBS school that doesn't recruit high school players.
Is that what they do? I hadn't followed it. But I do think some school in the near future will mostly or entirely forgo high school recruiting in favor of using NIL and year-round tampering to build their roster from somewhat older players. The very top programs will still mostly use high school because otherwise it's picking from guys the best teams or NFL didn't want. Wild times a-coming.Like Mankato St hockey?
Mankato takes almost all guys that have played 2 years of junior hockey. Lots of 20-21 year old freshman. Granted hockey is different with the junior route which doesn't exist in football.Is that what they do? I hadn't followed it. But I do think some school in the near future will mostly or entirely forgo high school recruiting in favor of using NIL and year-round tampering to build their roster from somewhat older players. The very top programs will still mostly use high school because otherwise it's picking from guys the best teams or NFL didn't want. Wild times a-coming.
Not many people work 80 hour weeks but sure.
You don’t have to believe me. I’m sorry that you don’t agree? I don’t really know why you’re upset about it.Yeah, I don’t believe you about 80 hour work weeks for 30 years. There is work and then there’s “work” sitting in the office or socializing or watching tape pending the coach stopping in.
Sixty hour weeks are more believable and even busier weeks and months during the season and draft are believable with media obligations etc but like I said that’s part and parcel of a professional life. I don’t count commuting, traveling, dinner, or social hours. Some might.
Getting back to NFL versus college I’d guess college coaches are working harder evaluating way more tape, recruiting, phone calls, media, public service appearances, counseling players.
Not upset at all. I was struck by the long hours talk so I responded, on a ten second whim.. World’s smallest violin for professional coaches and players. I just don’t understand talking about it even if true. Maybe my impression of it being a humble brag was way off. Apologies. Didn’t mean to derail the thread.You don’t have to believe me. I’m sorry that you don’t agree? I don’t really know why you’re upset about it.
I don’t think anyone complained. I shared my perspective of knowing a 30 year nfl coach who rose near the top of the profession.Not upset at all. I was struck by the long hours talk so I responded, on a ten second whim.. World’s smallest violin for professional coaches and players. I just don’t understand talking about it even if true. Maybe my impression of it being a humble brag was way off. Apologies. Didn’t mean to derail the thread.
Yes no other generation ever thought that before!
(I mean sure that is demonstrably false but hey old guys blaming the youth is beyond cliche)
That's not uncommon in hockey, and it's been that way for years. UND used to have rosters full of older Canadian guys back in the day as well.Mankato takes almost all guys that have played 2 years of junior hockey. Lots of 20-21 year old freshman. Granted hockey is different with the junior route which doesn't exist in football.
A few years ago there was a game where the Gophers oldest player would have been the youngest (or maybe 2nd youngest) player on Mankato's roster.
This isn't a matter of "allowing it." The O'Bannon and Alston court rulings didn't give the presidents a choice. The courts found in favor of the players, regardless of what you or anyone else thinks.The presidents have absolutely messed this up by allowing this. The supposed primary purpose is to get these kids an education and a degree. So many of these transfers will never achieve that. They need to go back to 1 year sit out on a transfer.
My nephew wants to transfer to the school his old girlfriend is at.Wonder the % of players entering the portal are
Disgruntled
Looking for NIL $
Coach leaving the program
Playing time
Scholastic
Recruited by another school