GophersInIowa
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Messages
- 44,370
- Reaction score
- 27,049
- Points
- 113
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The top recruit in the land will do that for you, they had another McDonalds American too didn't they?Has there ever been a more average team covered by ESPN than this year's LSU team? Honestly, we get that Ben Simmons is great and all, but I don't remember any other freshman getting this much attention in recent years.
Wiggins and Embidd were covered at Kansas, that team was very good and I still think this LSU team got more pub.
Duke is always covered like crazy and Okafor got a lot of attention, for good reason. I think this LSU team got close to that much coverage.
Am I just way off base on this or did it feel like ESPN was just trying way too hard to cover LSU and Simmons to manufacture a story? I'm fine if I never hear from that team again. They weren't awful, they weren't great. They were just average. Not worth nearly as much coverage as they got.
From the looks of the semifinal game vs. Texas A&M it was obvious they had already decided not to participate.
The top recruit in the land will do that for you, they had another McDonalds American too didn't they?
Ben Simmons seems like LSU's own version of Kris Humphries. You had an NBA focused one and done superstar, a weak and overmatched coach, bad team chemistry, and a terribly disappointing season people associated with the program want over and forgotten.
Has there ever been a more average team covered by ESPN than this year's LSU team? Honestly, we get that Ben Simmons is great and all, but I don't remember any other freshman getting this much attention in recent years.
Wiggins and Embidd were covered at Kansas, that team was very good and I still think this LSU team got more pub.
Duke is always covered like crazy and Okafor got a lot of attention, for good reason. I think this LSU team got close to that much coverage.
Am I just way off base on this or did it feel like ESPN was just trying way too hard to cover LSU and Simmons to manufacture a story? I'm fine if I never hear from that team again. They weren't awful, they weren't great. They were just average. Not worth nearly as much coverage as they got.
Except Simmons averaged more assists per game than Hunphries had in the entire season
Otherwise a very good analogy IMO.
Except Simmons averaged more assists per game than Hunphries had in the entire season
Otherwise a very good analogy IMO.
I'm no Humphries backer, but let's at least acknowledge he's had a solid NBA career. Longer than the vanilla gorilla and many other gopher nba hopefuls...
Absolutely. I actually really like Humphries. His college career just left a lot to be desired as far as team success.
That could be true, but I think it's even simpler than that. Since ESPN controls nearly all of the NBA (other than TNT) and gets to show NBA games Saturday and Sunday on ABC, they're choosing to drive it as their cash cow. It's easier for them to draw viewers to the NBA because it's just a star driven league that doesn't require a lot of effort to pay attention.How much of the new NBA TV deal has already affected college basketball?
The conspiracy theorist in me wants to say its because both LA and Boston will likely have top-5 picks and good shots at landing Simmons, so the network wants to build him up even more before he potentially gets to one of those teams. I need a life haha
I'm no Humphries backer, but let's at least acknowledge he's had a solid NBA career. Longer than the vanilla gorilla and many other gopher nba hopefuls...