PMWinSTP
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2015
- Messages
- 16,594
- Reaction score
- 6,012
- Points
- 113
Targeting is the only reviewable contact penalty is my understanding.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh, you meant of penalty calls...
Targeting is the only reviewable contact penalty is my understanding.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
![]()
Leidner's knee is down. Neither player was close to going toward the ground. It should've been a penalty - absolutely no question about it.
![]()
Leidner's knee is down. Neither player was close to going toward the ground. It should've been a penalty - absolutely no question about it.
Picking that flag up cost us the game........The next play was the 16 yard punt.
Ok so I was at the game and I'm pretty sure we didn't lose... I don't recall drinking too much....
If only the human brain could pause like this. I would say it "could have" been called a foul instead of "should have".
You can nit pick all day about whether one or both of those players should have been flagged, but the OP is correct that Leidner can't buy a call. He almost NEVER gets the benefit of the doubt. Anything close goes the other way.
They didn't need to land on him. Both of them. Not much different than the timing (not the targeting part) in the Celestin hit vs OSU and he was definitely called for a penalty there.
The refs have been inconsistent. I know you're a referee and like to defend them, but at some point just say they made a mistake!!!! It's ok - they're human.