Lots of talk about qualifications, experience, etc, etc,etc. Little about the intangibles, and fit with your team. These are things that can only be felt out in lengthy interview processes. Many people are "qualified" for position X, but people are hired and fired and passed over and promoted for the intangibles.
I get the feeling NFL teams put more time into vetting Connor Cook than Kaler will into his next AD. Lots of,cooks in the kitchen. A search firm, 16 member committee. Will there be a chimney and smoke signals?
She is INTERIM AD by default. Nobody would be taking her job
Because many of us feel the U could use someone with real business experience to take the Dept to a new level, rather than someone with simply more "administrative experience," ie a bureaucrat. The U already has too many bureaucrats.
So someone with business experience is good for an athletic director (for some reason), but someone with experience in the field is merely a "bureaucrat"? And their business experience is inherently great, while actual experience in actually leading an athletic department is just "administrative experience"? Got it.
The whole thing is just mind-blowing to me. It'd be like posting a job opening for an MD and really hoping that only attorneys apply, because MDs aren't qualified to be MDs.