short ornery norwegian
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2011
- Messages
- 21,873
- Reaction score
- 15,869
- Points
- 113
Does a running QB have anything to do with it? Is Smith "trying too hard" or something to that affect, to account for a running QB?
We did "better", in a sense, against Indiana and Iowa, which had more traditional QBs ... right? I can't recall now, off the top of my head. I think Maryland had a running QB too? Or maybe the wrinkle with them was their "jet sweep option" scheme on offense.
Maybe he (Smith) is just putting too much on his LB and DB's plates?? Taking wild stabs in the dark, here.
I think, in general, any offense is more effective, and harder to stop, when the QB is a viable running threat - because it gives the defense more to prepare for. In college FB, all things being equal, I would prefer to have a QB who is a real 2-way threat. Over the years, mobile QB's have always given the Gophers trouble.
I know some defenses will have a guy who "spies" on the QB and acts as a safety valve in case the QB runs. I don't claim to know how the Gophers handle those situations.