If one of the players leaked this and think this helps, I don't know how.
I only could read 10 pages before feeling like a creep (actually felt like a creep after the first page of her description of the event)....
Boycotting players are going to look pretty stupid after people read that.
From what I could tell, Merrick Jackson was very involved. And he's never been mentioned thus far. Why?
not sure when I'll sit down to read it, but from the early reaction here I may not
regardless, sounds like folks might be shameful to see some of these guys represent the U at a bowl game...
so for those that read it, how come players weren't arrested? should they have been per the details?
Once the BoR members read this, and in light of the players supporting their "brothers" and Claeys supporting the "kids", I wouldn't be surprised if we see a self-imposed, if temporary, elimination of the football program. A year or two off, with the blessing of the B1G, to completely clean house.
not sure when I'll sit down to read it, but from the early reaction here I may not
regardless, sounds like folks might be shameful to see some of these guys represent the U at a bowl game...
so for those that read it, how come players weren't arrested? should they have been per the details?
I think that's a bit harsh. There wasn't a football cover-up of this or any sort of scandal that we know of yet is there?
This was 10 Adults acting like idiots. It will ruin 11 people's lives, minimum.
I don't think we need to extend that further.
I think that's a bit harsh. There wasn't a football cover-up of this or any sort of scandal that we know of yet is there?
This was 10 kids acting like idiots. It will ruin 11 people's lives, minimum.
I don't think we need to extend that further.
The recruit said yes and that he was not going to come to the University because "it was
too ****ed up."
These people are in college, they are living on their own, buying their own food, paying their own rent, driving their own vehicles, they are not kids. They are Adults.
If one of the players leaked this and think this helps, I don't know how.
Didn't mean anything other than they are students.
What I find to be curious is that the EOAA comes to the conclusion that the sex wasn't consensual based on the inconsistencies from the players but that the inconsistencies from the accused actually make her more believable. Plus the accuser refused to grant the EOAA access the 90 second video that the police say was their primary reasoning behind call the sex consensual.
The EOAA also claims that because players deleted threads and texts after hearing about an accusation that they violated student code by hindering investigation. Of course the investigation they hindered wont actually start for weeks after the incident and the police didn't care about those texts/messages because they didn't speak to consent, which was what they were investigating and concluded that there wasn't enough evidence to bring charges.
In the end, if consent is supposed, this is a whole lot of nothing (see DA decision) if consent is not supposed then it is a horrible and horrific incident (see EOAA).
Hard to bring those two divergent points together as outsiders (which is why there will be many opposing view points) as I am sure that the guys who had sex with her are all saying she agreed to it and their teammates and coaches believe them.
This sucks!
Some of the players seemed to think it was wrong. I assume this isn't the inconsistencyWhat I find to be curious is that the EOAA comes to the conclusion that the sex wasn't consensual based on the inconsistencies from the players but that the inconsistencies from the accused actually make her more believable. Plus the accuser refused to grant the EOAA access the 90 second video that the police say was their primary reasoning behind call the sex consensual.
The EOAA also claims that because players deleted threads and texts after hearing about an accusation that they violated student code by hindering investigation. Of course the investigation they hindered wont actually start for weeks after the incident and the police didn't care about those texts/messages because they didn't speak to consent, which was what they were investigating and concluded that there wasn't enough evidence to bring charges.
In the end, if consent is supposed, this is a whole lot of nothing (see DA decision) if consent is not supposed then it is a horrible and horrific incident (see EOAA).
Hard to bring those two divergent points together as outsiders (which is why there will be many opposing view points) as I am sure that the guys who had sex with her are all saying she agreed to it and their teammates and coaches believe them.
This sucks!