I'm new on this forum. I've been lurking forever but I've always been content to just read the boards. However, there was a thread going talking about bringing Mason back to coach and I got so angry with some of the stuff I read that I had to register. By the time I got the approval to post, I'd calmed down a bit and I couldn't find the thread so I just let it go. On second thought, I'm going to respond now.
I believe two things: Kill has the full backing and support of this administration and the recent woes in the football program can be pinned on Maturi.
The scuttlebutt was this: Mason was a good coach that ran a respected program and not only did not receive support from the administration but was actively undermined in his efforts to upgrade the program--agree or disagree, that was the perception in coaching circles. When Maturi canned Mason (instead of, say, finding the money to attract a top notch defensive coordinator), the U seemed caught off-guard when no other established coach wanted the job because of the perception that Minnesota already tossed a good coach without actually offering the support and resources to move the program up the ladder. The perception was that Mason was capable; Minnesota institutionally wasn't capable or willing.
Brewster, was, well, Brewster. That's over. Enough said. However, the damage from Mason/Maturi fiasco was reinforced and the perception of the Minnesota coaching job among the first-tier candidates was: "Who needs it?"
Kill was both literally and figuratively the best coach the U could get. Whether consciously or subconsciously, I think Teague understands that he has to do his very best to give Kill the time and resources to make it or break it on his own--regardless of the health issues. I think he knows that if Kill gets thrown under the bus now, there's no way the U will ever attract a tier one coach in his lifetime. I think both Kaler and Teague are going to support Kill and the program to the greatest degree possible. Kill gets, at a minimum, five years unless he decides to leave on his own.
Having said that, with the proper support and resources, I think Mason would be a good pick if Kill had to leave. He always seemed one defensive coordinator away from the next level, and I thought Maturi made a huge mistake in impulsively firing Mason and in hiring Brewster. I lay the recent woes squarely at the feet of Maturi.
I'll also add this: Although I thought Brewster was a mistake from the get-go, he did have one thing going for him I really liked: "You've got to play the best to be the best." So he set out to shove the cupcakes off the table and get some meat and potatoes on the menu. He was, IMHO, right there--he just couldn't coach. But he did understand recruiting somewhat, and he understood that recruits are easier to attract when you can say, "Hey, we play the B1G and Texas and North Carolina and USC." That's a lot more attractive to recruits than, "And you'll get to play the Jackrabbits!" It's doubly effective if the recruit was contacted but not offered by Texas or North Carolina or USC. I was kind of disappointed when I read that Kill subscribed to the Snyder-scheduling philosophy of Mason. You know, "Eat dessert first." The problem with that is if you have a hard time digesting your cupcakes, you just look pathetic. At least USC is quality loss--something NMSU most definitely is not. Teams tend to rise or sink to the level of the competition--even well-coached teams. It's just one of those weird psychological things.
Bottom line: Kill's not on the hotseat and this is a program headed in the right direction. Thank god, I'm 54 and I'd kind of like to see everything coming up Roses sometime in my life.
Next year in Pasadena. (Gotta get a t-shirt made up for that. Someone there contact Goldy's for me.)