JosephKaros33
Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2022
- Messages
- 30
- Reaction score
- 22
- Points
- 8
Wish him the best. I would think he could go pretty much anywhere and build a program?
Link to Jim Leonhard's Tweet
Link to Jim Leonhard's Tweet
I think there are some Wisconsin beat reporters who trust their sources but their sources are feeding them department rumors not factswell, this story keeps turning. unless it was not reported correctly.
But the earlier stories made it sound like Leonhard was staying.
again, I would love to be a fly on the wall in the AD's office to know what was really going on behind the scenes.
there has to be more to this than has been reported to date.
There are legitimately no earnest hard-hitting journalists on the Badger sports beat, particularly football, who are going to turn up anything on this story. They didn’t even break the Fickell news. It’s a company town, and their employers know what keeps people buying their product, so they don’t rock the boat. Never have, in the Madison or Milwaukee markets, at least in the 30 years since Alvarez took over.I think there are some Wisconsin beat reporters who trust their sources but their sources are feeding them department rumors not facts
Same reporters who said he was a done deal head coach were saying he was back
There are legitimately no earnest hard-hitting journalists on the Badger sports beat, particularly football, who are going to turn up anything on this story. They didn’t even break the Fickell news. It’s a company town, and their employers know what keeps people buying their product, so they don’t rock the boat. Never have, in the Madison or Milwaukee markets, at least in the 30 years since Alvarez took over.
It was just obviously and blatantly wrong. And most Badger fans even thought it was BS.Not surprising that Lrinard would leave...found the original story that he was staying bewildering.
That is not completely true. The WSJ beat reporters are more objective than the beat writer for the Milwaukee paper.It was just obviously and blatantly wrong. And most Badger fans even thought it was BS.
Their sportswriters are blind homers. The writers that cover Badger athletics for the State Journal make Sid (in his day) look like Patrick Reusse (in his day).
That is not completely true. The WSJ beat reporters are more objective than the beat writer for the Milwaukee paper.
In fairness, all the reporters report what they are told by their sources and negative reporting dries up those sources.
No one ever, never, anywhere surpassed "Homer" Hartman.
I agree.It never made sense for Leonhard to stay, once Fickell was hired.
Perfectly saidThere are legitimately no earnest hard-hitting journalists on the Badger sports beat, particularly football, who are going to turn up anything on this story. They didn’t even break the Fickell news. It’s a company town, and their employers know what keeps people buying their product, so they don’t rock the boat. Never have, in the Madison or Milwaukee markets, at least in the 30 years since Alvarez took over.
If you take the "new coach mike keep rando loved old coach" articles as an example ... it almost never actually happens.It was just obviously and blatantly wrong. And most Badger fans even thought it was BS.
Their sportswriters are blind homers. The writers that cover Badger athletics for the State Journal make Sid (in his day) look like Patrick Reusse (in his day).
kudos to you for owning.This is the best news I’ve heard all week, and I’ll gladly say Some guy and others were correct!!! I’ll stick to my belief that he will be the sconsin head coach within the next 7 years.
You mean like how JL was the coach for sure for weeks...then one day notsomuch?There is another possibility or two. 1 He changed his mind. 2 He has some intriguing offers elsewhere to consider that recently presented themselves.
If it was reported incorrectly would we have a several days gap to correct it?
It would be defensive coordinator or nothing else. He'll get lots of opportunities as a coordinator.Would love for the Vikings to find a role for him.
In this case, yesThere is another possibility or two. 1 He changed his mind. 2 He has some intriguing offers elsewhere to consider that recently presented themselves.
If it was reported incorrectly would we have a several days gap to correct it?
CorrectHim staying on till the bowl game and then leaving makes way more sense than him becoming a permanent part of Fickell's staff. Was very surprised when it was reported that he was staying.
I'm not sold that Donatell is great, that is for sure.Would love for the Vikings to find a role for him.
Tough to know what the truth is but wouldn't put a ton of stock in Fickell saying he was open to keeping him on staff as that was probably more of a PR move than anything considering how popular Leonhard is with current players and the fan base.Athletic reporting that Fickell was open to keeping Leonhard on staff.
So Leonard either has in hand or thinks he will have better opportunities elsewhere.
Maybe he will take over for another former Badger, Sean Lewis, as HC at Kent State?
The bolded makes perfect sense. (Although it worked out in Remember the Titans )No way Fickell wants his DC to be someone who was in serious contention to be the head coach when he was hired.