J Robinson supports John Anderson for AD, not national search.

station19

Moderator
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
22,605
Reaction score
1
Points
36
Charlie Walters:

http://www.twincities.com/vikings/c...lters-notre-dames-harrison-smith-fits-vikings

DON'T PRINT THAT

J Robinson, the Gophers wrestling coach who has won three NCAA titles and six Big Ten championships, sees no reason to go outside for Minnesota's new athletics director.

"We want to see a person who understands the university, understands winning, understands fundraising, understands what coaching is and what the student-athlete experience is," Robinson said. "I think there are people here who fit that bill and that you don't have to go around the country to look for."

Robinson would like Gophers baseball coach John Anderson to succeed departing AD Joel Maturi.

"I'm guessing we're paying Joel Maturi somewhere around $400,000; why do we want to pay someone $800,000 or $900,000 and add a half-million dollars?" Robinson said. "It doesn't make sense. Why do we have to spend $100,000 (search firm fee) to look around when there are people here who already understand the problems?

"The university has come out with a list of what they want (in a new AD). Everything on that list, John Anderson is. He understands winning, he understands fundraising - he raised $7.5 million (for a new stadium) - he understands the university, he understands the student-athlete experience. He understands it all because he's lived it, been a part of it. He's seen it.

"But the most important thing of all those is that he understands the problems that need to be fixed. That in itself is the critical thing. He's been through nine athletic directors and three or four presidents, so he understands what the problems are and the campus structure. And you have to be able to understand that to be able to fix it."

Robinson, 65, who has been at Minnesota for 26 years, said money isn't the answer to improving Gophers athletics.

"Everybody says we've got to invest more money in football and basketball, and that's not true," he said. "It's the biggest farce in the world, and nobody will talk about it. From 1972 to 1992, Indiana won the Big Ten (men's) basketball title 10 times. From 1992 to 2012, they won it twice. You think they invested any less money in the last 20 years? No. What was the difference? The difference was one thing - leadership."

Football?

"From 1992 to 2012, 75 percent of the time Michigan, Ohio State or Wisconsin won the Big Ten," Robinson said. "Northwestern won it three times in the last 20 years. Are you trying to tell me they spent more money than those other schools and they won it three times? Money's not the factor."

The Gophers expect to name a new AD by next month.

"So we're going to look for this big, highfalutin AD who's going to cost us a half-million dollars more? We're going to add another half-million dollars of debt when we have somebody that, if you double the guy's salary, already knows what all the problems are. You have to know what the problems are and have the power to fix them.

"Instead of coming in here for one or two or three years and then trying to figure out what's going on here, you've already got somebody who already knows it. John Anderson would do a great job."

Anderson, 56, is a Minnesota grad who has more Big Ten baseball coaching victories than anyone in history. He is about to sign a new five-year contract.
 

I really like this idea, and it's something that never crossed my mind. Anderson is a great coach who definitely has had success where mediocrity is more than acceptable, and has displayed that he has the chops to be what we need as an AD from a fundraising standpoint. I would be supportive of this, through I don't know enough about the guy to understand what his weaknesses would be. Anyone have any input?

Also, I don't like Robinson's idea that we don't need to invest a greater amount of money into football or basketball, because we need to spend money, at least at this point, to be able to catch up with the perennial contenders so we can become one too. I don't want to win the Big Ten three times in 20 years and sit in the cellar for the other 17. I want to be in a position to win the Big Ten every year.
 

I'm not sure about AD but Coach Anderson has done an unbelievable job as the baseball coach (he surpassed the legend and his mentor Dick Siebert with the most wins). It is a crime the way he has been treated with one-year contracts when no one has been more loyal to the University than Coach Anderson. You can make a very strong case that he is the best coach in the State at all levels. He wins against all odds and does it consistently. We're now finally giving him a 5-year contract?!? He is way, way underpaid! You could give him a blank contract and I'm convinced he'd still underpay himself he is that good of a guy. At a minimum, they should name the new baseball field SA Field (Siebert-Anderson Field). It's the least we could do for someone who has done so much with and for so little for our great University. Thank you Coach Anderson for sticking with us all these years!!!

Go Gophers!
 

I don't think Anderson or any internal candidate will be considered. This will be Kaler's guy, and housecleaning is unfortunately required. Like any organization, there are some great people, a lot of good people, some bad people, and some really bad people. There will be collateral damage, but hopefully that will be minimal. It's the way things have to be.
 

I think it is in poor taste for a current head coach at the U to publicly criticize the search process put forth by President Kahler and the University of Minnesota.
 


I think it is in poor taste for a current head coach at the U to publicly criticize the search process put forth by President Kahler and the University of Minnesota.

I think it is in poor taste to find out that the only beer I have available is a Mid-July-Car-Trunk-Warm Blatz Light. :)
 

I love Jay Robinson, but he is full of crap about investing in football and basketball. Without them he would be coaching a club sport.
The last thing we need is a Gopher non-revenue coach as an AD, 10 years of Maturi is enough.
Personally, I want someone committed to the revenue sports and the non-revenue sports can continue to do well if we have th local talent to support them, and if we don't, we don't need them.
 


Charlie Walters:

http://www.twincities.com/vikings/c...lters-notre-dames-harrison-smith-fits-vikings

DON'T PRINT THAT

J Robinson, the Gophers wrestling coach who has won three NCAA titles and six Big Ten championships, sees no reason to go outside for Minnesota's new athletics director.

"We want to see a person who understands the university, understands winning, understands fundraising, understands what coaching is and what the student-athlete experience is," Robinson said. "I think there are people here who fit that bill and that you don't have to go around the country to look for."

Robinson would like Gophers baseball coach John Anderson to succeed departing AD Joel Maturi.

"I'm guessing we're paying Joel Maturi somewhere around $400,000; why do we want to pay someone $800,000 or $900,000 and add a half-million dollars?" Robinson said. "It doesn't make sense. Why do we have to spend $100,000 (search firm fee) to look around when there are people here who already understand the problems?

"The university has come out with a list of what they want (in a new AD). Everything on that list, John Anderson is. He understands winning, he understands fundraising - he raised $7.5 million (for a new stadium) - he understands the university, he understands the student-athlete experience. He understands it all because he's lived it, been a part of it. He's seen it.

"But the most important thing of all those is that he understands the problems that need to be fixed. That in itself is the critical thing. He's been through nine athletic directors and three or four presidents, so he understands what the problems are and the campus structure. And you have to be able to understand that to be able to fix it."

Robinson, 65, who has been at Minnesota for 26 years, said money isn't the answer to improving Gophers athletics.

"Everybody says we've got to invest more money in football and basketball, and that's not true," he said. "It's the biggest farce in the world, and nobody will talk about it. From 1972 to 1992, Indiana won the Big Ten (men's) basketball title 10 times. From 1992 to 2012, they won it twice. You think they invested any less money in the last 20 years? No. What was the difference? The difference was one thing - leadership."

Football?

"From 1992 to 2012, 75 percent of the time Michigan, Ohio State or Wisconsin won the Big Ten," Robinson said. "Northwestern won it three times in the last 20 years. Are you trying to tell me they spent more money than those other schools and they won it three times? Money's not the factor."

The Gophers expect to name a new AD by next month.

"So we're going to look for this big, highfalutin AD who's going to cost us a half-million dollars more? We're going to add another half-million dollars of debt when we have somebody that, if you double the guy's salary, already knows what all the problems are. You have to know what the problems are and have the power to fix them.

"Instead of coming in here for one or two or three years and then trying to figure out what's going on here, you've already got somebody who already knows it. John Anderson would do a great job."

Anderson, 56, is a Minnesota grad who has more Big Ten baseball coaching victories than anyone in history. He is about to sign a new five-year contract.

Bingo! We have a winner. I can support John Anderson as long as he is given sufficient leash to get it done.
 



nope. this is just another non-revenue sport coach at the U of M who desperately wants another non-revenue sport coach in the new AD spot in order to keep things just the way they have been during joel maturi's tenure. which is essentially a bigger share of the pie for non-revenue sports operations than i think they are entitled to. no thanks. that is not the approach we should take and i don't think it is the way to go.

john anderson is a good guy and has done really well with the U of M baseball program. i wish him continued success. but i personally don't want to see him as the next U of M AD.
 

nope. this is just another non-revenue sport coach at the U of M who desperately wants another non-revenue sport coach in the new AD spot in order to keep things just the way they have been during joel maturi's tenure. which is essentially a bigger share of the pie for non-revenue sports operations than i think they are entitled to. no thanks. that is not the approach we should take and i don't think it is the way to go.

john anderson is a good guy and has done really well with the U of M baseball program. i wish him continued success. but i personally don't want to see him as the next U of M AD.

John Anderson may very well be a viable candidate for the job, but to say the search should be only from within and not national is preposterous.
 

The next A.D. needs to be a fundraiser first and foremost. Anderson's fundraising efforts for the baseball stadium weren't exactly inspiring. Neither was his "I'm never going to sign my contract" attitude either.

Besides the non-revenue haters would never shut-up about it.
 

nope. this is just another non-revenue sport coach at the U of M who desperately wants another non-revenue sport coach in the new AD spot in order to keep things just the way they have been during joel maturi's tenure. which is essentially a bigger share of the pie for non-revenue sports operations than i think they are entitled to. no thanks. that is not the approach we should take and i don't think it is the way to go.

And you've confirmed that this is the way John Anderson feels? Why do we have to waste the time of a search committee when you don't even need to have a conversation with a potential candidate. We can just dismiss them with our assumptions.

What about Joel Maturi's tenure has benefitted J Robinson and John Anderson? Are they the highest paid coaches in their leagues? Nope. Have they signed multi-year contracts? Nope (unless J Rob finally signed one this year). Do they have top notch facilities compared to their peers? He11 nope.
 



I agree with highwayman, station19, and Dr. Don.

Especially Dr. Don. I haven't had a drink in almost 28 years (not that I'm counting), but I could actually taste the beer you described Dr.
 

I agree with highwayman, station19, and Dr. Don.

Especially Dr. Don. I haven't had a drink in almost 28 years (not that I'm counting), but I could actually taste the beer you described Dr.

Both of those guys are very good coaches, so no disrespect intended, but when I buy football and basketball tickets I want to see good football and basketball games, whether we ever win another baseball game or wrestling match. If I have to pick, they lose. So do 90% of the rest of the people buying tickets. If they have all the answers sell some tickets to their games/ matches, or raise enough money to make them break even sports every year. Then we can believe they have answers that can help the whole athletic program.
They just know they deserve more because what, they can win at sports that have serious fan bases at about 10-20 schools in the country????
 

I love Jay Robinson, but he is full of crap about investing in football and basketball. Without them he would be coaching a club sport.
The last thing we need is a Gopher non-revenue coach as an AD, 10 years of Maturi is enough.
Personally, I want someone committed to the revenue sports and the non-revenue sports can continue to do well if we have th local talent to support them, and if we don't, we don't need them.

Yeah, why would we listen to the moste successful Gopher Coach over the last decade...what the hell does J know, right? Maybe, just maybe, some of our 2nd class (right Corcoran1) non-revenue coaches might be able to teach our major revenue sports a thing or two about winning championships! I, for one, think John Anderson would be a fantastic choice for the next AD.
 

I knew one of the student managers for the baseball team a few years ago and he said that Anderson LOVES baseball. It is his passion. I take that to mean that if given the choice, he would continue coaching baseball instead of being an AD. A baseball coach and an AD have very dissimilar skill sets and qualifications, and I have to think that Coach Anderson is very happy where he is and would like to remain coaching the game he loves.
 

Coach of irrelevant sport wants coach of irrelevant sport as AD so irrelevant sports continue to be more important than relevant sports? Ok, got it..... I think
 

Coach of irrelevant sport wants coach of irrelevant sport as AD so irrelevant sports continue to be more important than relevant sports? Ok, got it..... I think
No one actually knows this is what it will be like.
 

Predictable and obvious response from the non-revenue sports folks, J as a mouthpiece.
I'm not even saying it's a bad thing, but it's obvious pandering for status quo funding and emphasis of the NR sports Maturi championed.

Bottom line, the next AD needs to play big boy college athletics.
Tough and bold decisions need to be made. Vision for the future needs to be taken into account. Leadership needs to inspire and invoke passion.

I agree with J's statement on leadership being the difference, sadly our current lame duck AD was the most damaging leader the AD has had since the football team was moved to the dome. His lack of spine, passion, and common sense damned the athletics department to horrifically low levels, somehow made better in his own mind by NR sports success. All the while enraging and alienating loyal fans, while refusing to take steps need to expand the fanbase.

Anderson is a great baseball coach by all accounts, I'm sure the new AD will interview all the coaches to see what they suggest needs to be fixed, but simply putting a baseball coach in charge because "He's been here." Makes no sense.

IMO the next AD needs to be;
An outside the box thinker. Specifically on how to increase the fanbase and expand coverage.
Willing to shake things up on campus and in the AD.
A charismatic fundraiser and leader who is willing to embrace traditions and rivalries.
NOT ANYTHING CLOSE TO MATURI.
 

IMO the next AD needs to be;
An outside the box thinker. Specifically on how to increase the fanbase and expand coverage.
Willing to shake things up on campus and in the AD.
A charismatic fundraiser and leader who is willing to embrace traditions and rivalries.
NOT ANYTHING CLOSE TO MATURI.

Not disagreeing with your sentiments, but Brew was both of the items I bolded in your quote. He also attempted to shake things up in regards to how we embraced our football team. We all know how well that went with the general public and the media.

If we get a guy like this and don't become successful quickly in the revenue sports, this guy will be an easy target for every detractor in the book. It's inevitable in this state.
 

Not disagreeing with your sentiments, but Brew was both of the items I bolded in your quote. He also attempted to shake things up in regards to how we embraced our football team. We all know how well that went with the general public and the media.

If we get a guy like this and don't become successful quickly in the revenue sports, this guy will be an easy target for every detractor in the book. It's inevitable in this state.

Different deal when the AD displays those traits.
I'm of the opinion Maturi was simply unwilling to ruffle any feathers or do anything to mess with his bean counted bottom line. His full on lovefest with Wisconsin was also sickening to the point it discredited him even further as a Gopher AD.
A candidate AD can be an outside the box thinker, and charismatic, while still being calculating, qualified, and solid all around. It doesn't have to be one way or the other, and shouldn't be.
 

Different deal when the AD displays those traits.
I'm of the opinion Maturi was simply unwilling to ruffle any feathers or do anything to mess with his bean counted bottom line. His full on lovefest with Wisconsin was also sickening to the point it discredited him even further as a Gopher AD.
A candidate AD can be an outside the box thinker, and charismatic, while still being calculating, qualified, and solid all around. It doesn't have to be one way or the other, and shouldn't be.

..and he should be able to fly, ward off bullets, and leap buildings with a single bound..

Gees, no wonder you're always complaining..
 

The next A.D. needs to be a fundraiser first and foremost. Anderson's fundraising efforts for the baseball stadium weren't exactly inspiring. Neither was his "I'm never going to sign my contract" attitude either.

Besides the non-revenue haters would never shut-up about it.

See what I mean?
 

As much as I admire grappler's passion...J Robinson, as all wrestling coaches, are nowhere without the revenue sports to fund them. We must, MUST, take our heads out the sand. Without the revenue-engine sports running at full steam, the non-revenue sports will die on the vine as well. It is only a matter of time.

I agree with others on Anderson. If he was so good at raising money, why has the baseball stadium fund raising gone so poorly? Without a couple of major donors, we'd still be years away...

He's a great coach and recruiter. Not an AD candidate.
 

..and he should be able to fly, ward off bullets, and leap buildings with a single bound..

Gees, no wonder you're always complaining..

There are plenty of dynamic and innovative leaders in this country, why should we settle for a flawed candidate? I seriously expect the new AD to be a breath of fresh air. Anything less would be disappointing, and IMO would indicate that Kaler lost the political battle he is negotiating right now.

This university's reputation locally has plummeted in the last 10 years. While sports should absolutely not be close to a top priority for a school, the fact is a successful sports program instills pride and give exposure to the school and state as a whole.
 

There are plenty of dynamic and innovative leaders in this country, why should we settle for a flawed candidate? I seriously expect the new AD to be a breath of fresh air. Anything less would be disappointing, and IMO would indicate that Kaler lost the political battle he is negotiating right now.

This university's reputation locally has plummeted in the last 10 years. While sports should absolutely not be close to a top priority for a school, the fact is a successful sports program instills pride and give exposure to the school and state as a whole.

Read your earlier post. A "dynamic and innovative" candidate would fall well short of your previous requirements.
 

Read your earlier post. A "dynamic and innovative" candidate would fall well short of your previous requirements.

So what do you want our next AD to be like?
I don't get what you're trying to point out here. Should we expect a flake or another bean counter?
Why can't an AD be soundly qualified and experienced, yet still have new and exciting ideas/perspectives, and a strong dynamic personality?
 

A " flake or another bean counter" or a "outside the box thinker, and charismatic, while still being calculating, qualified, and solid all around..soundly qualified and experienced, yet still have new and exciting ideas/perspectives, and a strong dynamic personality"

So you assume those are the choices. No wonder everybody at the U falls well short of your expectations. I'd assume you just didn't want another 'P.O.S.", you know how you described the present A.D.

Hey, I still read an occasional comic book. The difference is you appear to take them seriously.
 

A " flake or another bean counter" or a "outside the box thinker, and charismatic, while still being calculating, qualified, and solid all around..soundly qualified and experienced, yet still have new and exciting ideas/perspectives, and a strong dynamic personality"

So you assume those are the choices. No wonder everybody at the U falls well short of your expectations. I'd assume you just didn't want another 'P.O.S.", you know how you described the present A.D.

Hey, I still read an occasional comic book. The difference is you appear to take them seriously.

Doh' k.
Clearly you've been happy with the leadership Maturi brought to the table.
He's infuriating to me. I'm not alone in thinking he was drastically over his head.
I'm fed up with the type of thinking he represented during his time here.
We shouldn't need to settle for a damn thing. Kaler sees this, hence his very cold and calculated press conference announcing Maturi's retirement. His golden parachute is obviously a political nod to the people who think Maturi did no wrong here, including J robinson. I think he's damn lucky he wasn't ran out of town tarred and feathered with a one way ticket to Madison.

There's nothing positive I can say about Maturi's time here, sorry to disappoint.
I'm hoping for a smart and strong leader to come in and clean up this mess.
 




Top Bottom