From what I can see of MSU and other teams in the country, I dont think so.
MSU may be the best in the Big 10 (yet to be seen, imo) but the 2010 version is not as good as many past teams.
Thoughts?
From what I can see of MSU and other teams in the country, I dont think so.
MSU may be the best in the Big 10 (yet to be seen, imo) but the 2010 version is not as good as many past teams.
Thoughts?
They don't look like a top 10 team to me. They are too weak inside and teams that can pound inside will give them a lot of trouble.
They certainly have top ten talent, but I don't believe the players are used to their best capability. I give Izzo credit for recruiting, but his coaching is hardly more than shouting and screaming.
Really? If that was the case, every good recruiter would have gone to the NCAA tourney every year in their 15 years as a head coach, including 5 Final Four appearances, 1 runner up, and one national championship. I hardly think you have those kind of results with the players just coaching themselves
Maybe he is thinking of Matta?
From what I can see of MSU and other teams in the country, I dont think so.
MSU may be the best in the Big 10 (yet to be seen, imo) but the 2010 version is not as good as many past teams.
Thoughts?
You think MSU is the best team in the country?Top 5 I would say. The only thing missing is a big man in the middle. Who in the country is better? Texas? Kansas? Duke? Kentucky? None that I see.
They don't look like a top 10 team to me. They are too weak inside and teams that can pound inside will give them a lot of trouble.
That is my thought as well. IN the past, the inside game of MSU was stellar. Green is really good, from there not so much.
You think MSU is the best team in the country?