Is AKs play a concern?

GopherPharmaBiz

Active member
Joined
Nov 6, 2019
Messages
243
Reaction score
197
Points
43
Yup.
Both games, too. Arm strength is still there though.

I'm mildly dusappointed so far in Kaliakmanis. I was hoping an offseason of work would improve timing, accuracy and decision making
So far i havent seen it.

However, there is plenty of time for that, and meantime, there is still a ton of natural talent there. And it's not like he's been bad. Decent play and some flashes of better.

It's just not been as good as I was hoping. To get into another level of success, you need more from your QB than "decent."
Good, fair post and kind of sums up how I’m feeling about it.

Game 2 seemed better than game 1, but I spose that’s also partly a result of competition. Game 1 he seemed to lock onto one target and be unable to come off it- similar to a frustration I had with Morgan early on.

The side arm surprised me. I was looking forward to a QB taller than Morgan who might not have as many balls batted at the line, but with that low slot, AK’s throws seem prone to getting batted more than if his slot was higher.
 



short ornery norwegian

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 9, 2011
Messages
18,517
Reaction score
11,925
Points
113
in order to throw medium and deep routes, the QB needs time. I have a nagging feeling that the coaches don't necessarily trust the O-line in pass blocking - at least not long enough to allow longer routes to develop.

maybe I'm wrong, but I also have an idea that they are keeping BSF in to block more often instead of letting him release and get downfield - which could also be tied to concerns about pass-blocking.

hopefully this is something that can improve as the new O-linemen have more time to gel as a unit.
 

RememberMurray

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
7,843
Reaction score
7,013
Points
113
in order to throw medium and deep routes, the QB needs time. I have a nagging feeling that the coaches don't necessarily trust the O-line in pass blocking - at least not long enough to allow longer routes to develop.

maybe I'm wrong, but I also have an idea that they are keeping BSF in to block more often instead of letting him release and get downfield - which could also be tied to concerns about pass-blocking.

hopefully this is something that can improve as the new O-linemen have more time to gel as a unit.

The o-line definitely needs more time to gel as a unit. Great observation, SON.

That being said, the o-line graded out higher in pass blocking than in the run game against Nebraska. It will be interesting to see if that is also true vs EMU.

My impression: the pass protection seemed pretty good. I don't remember a lot of pressure on Kaliakmanis. EMU did have one sack.
 


FanSinceTheFifties

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
1,185
Reaction score
386
Points
83
I often wonder if those fans who yen for deep passes do so because such plays are exciting or if they really think they're useful. Unless they are a genuine threat to the defense even if incomplete (which most are) they only result in a loss of down.
However, I would throw deep on 2nd and a foot if I have Larry Csonka in my backfield.
 

bleedsmaroonandgold

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Messages
6,800
Reaction score
1,815
Points
113
I often wonder if those fans who yen for deep passes do so because such plays are exciting or if they really think they're useful. Unless they are a genuine threat to the defense even if incomplete (which most are) they only result in a loss of down.
However, I would throw deep on 2nd and a foot if I have Larry Csonka in my backfield.
It's partly a symptoms of us struggling in the red zone. For whatever reason, we are having trouble finishing drives and getting the TD. Better red zone execution would be a fix for that, but so would scoring on some big play deep strikes.
 

PMWinSTP

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
15,028
Reaction score
4,651
Points
113
I often wonder if those fans who yen for deep passes do so because such plays are exciting or if they really think they're useful. Unless they are a genuine threat to the defense even if incomplete (which most are) they only result in a loss of down.
However, I would throw deep on 2nd and a foot if I have Larry Csonka in my backfield.
There was at least one 2nd and short where I thought they would take the long shot...but ran it. Very vanilla offensive game plan Saturday.
 

FanSinceTheFifties

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
1,185
Reaction score
386
Points
83
It's partly a symptoms of us struggling in the red zone. For whatever reason, we are having trouble finishing drives and getting the TD. Better red zone execution would be a fix for that, but so would scoring on some big play deep strikes.
In goal line situations I wonder why teams never go on a quick count. Is that an old fashioned tactic?
 



PMWinSTP

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
15,028
Reaction score
4,651
Points
113
I think there were two 3rd and very short where a QB sneak would have been perfect. Used the RB instead... I think they got one and were stopped on one.
 
Last edited:


goldengophers

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 25, 2009
Messages
3,530
Reaction score
1,866
Points
113
Fleck offenses are just confounding and I would say underpeform their capabilities, if it weren't for D the heat would be up.
 

SanDiegoGopherFan

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2018
Messages
1,907
Reaction score
1,533
Points
113
I worry more about how our OC schemes and makes adjustments vs Athan.

Athan is good, so far I dont think our OC is at the same level as Cirroca, not bad like Sanford
 




kg21

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 25, 2021
Messages
17,589
Reaction score
8,529
Points
113
Fleck offenses are just confounding and I would say underpeform their capabilities, if it weren't for D the heat would be up.
Everything has to be a long, drawn out drive. It's just hard to score much without the big plays mixed in. We just never get any.
 



RememberMurray

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 25, 2019
Messages
7,843
Reaction score
7,013
Points
113
I'm 67 years old.

At some point in my life time, being a fan of a team changed fundamentally. We are no longer content to simply cheer for the team, and hope fervently that they win. Instead, we analyze every call, every move, every decision, and second guess them all. We pontificate about which play should have been called, and proclaim to an absolute certainty which player should be benched. This coach should be fired. That player should get more playing time.

We aren't really fans anymore. Instead, we're self-appointed experts. I'm including myself in this, by the way.
 


btowngopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 23, 2008
Messages
7,426
Reaction score
3,698
Points
113
He’s playing well enough to win the West. He’s making good decisions for the most part and is protecting the ball. He’s been accurate for the most part and is converting 3rd and longs. He looks poised in the pocket and has made plays with his legs.
 

Pompous Elitist

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
23,303
Reaction score
7,268
Points
113
I'm 67 years old.

At some point in my life time, being a fan of a team changed fundamentally. We are no longer content to simply cheer for the team, and hope fervently that they win. Instead, we analyze every call, every move, every decision, and second guess them all. We pontificate about which play should have been called, and proclaim to an absolute certainty which player should be benched. This coach should be fired. That player should get more playing time.

We aren't really fans anymore. Instead, we're self-appointed experts. I'm including myself in this, by the way.

I believe most of us are just shooting the breeze discussing football, which really isn’t that important but does qualify as an above average and fun entertainment diversion with a lot of complexity and intricacies.. Some take it a little further, which is fine. Some are trolls, and some are only here to rip on other fans.
 

MNVCGUY

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
17,644
Reaction score
16,321
Points
113
I'm 67 years old.

At some point in my life time, being a fan of a team changed fundamentally. We are no longer content to simply cheer for the team, and hope fervently that they win. Instead, we analyze every call, every move, every decision, and second guess them all. We pontificate about which play should have been called, and proclaim to an absolute certainty which player should be benched. This coach should be fired. That player should get more playing time.

We aren't really fans anymore. Instead, we're self-appointed experts. I'm including myself in this, by the way.
Going to go out on a limb and guess that things started changing sometime around the explosion of the internet.... :)
 

Dakota2

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 9, 2020
Messages
4,017
Reaction score
2,919
Points
113
I'm 67 years old.

At some point in my life time, being a fan of a team changed fundamentally. We are no longer content to simply cheer for the team, and hope fervently that they win. Instead, we analyze every call, every move, every decision, and second guess them all. We pontificate about which play should have been called, and proclaim to an absolute certainty which player should be benched. This coach should be fired. That player should get more playing time.

We aren't really fans anymore. Instead, we're self-appointed experts. I'm including myself in this, by the way.
We always did that talking to ourselves. Now we have internet and message boards to write it down.
 

USAF

Well-known member
Joined
May 24, 2019
Messages
7,612
Reaction score
9,105
Points
113
I'm 67 years old.

At some point in my life time, being a fan of a team changed fundamentally. We are no longer content to simply cheer for the team, and hope fervently that they win. Instead, we analyze every call, every move, every decision, and second guess them all. We pontificate about which play should have been called, and proclaim to an absolute certainty which player should be benched. This coach should be fired. That player should get more playing time.

We aren't really fans anymore. Instead, we're self-appointed experts. I'm including myself in this, by the way.
I'm 65. It's no different today than 40 years ago.
Whats different is we're talking about sports with thousands on the internet, rather than 2 or 3 at a bar or the work break room.
 



Gopher 461

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 6, 2019
Messages
268
Reaction score
337
Points
63
West winnable. BIG Championship, not so much. Michigan and Penn State appear to have the consistent balance to get to the Conference Championship and win it. BUT, as the old ball coach used to say, play the game and play it to win it. You never know about motivated college age ballers.
 

Willwin40

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 10, 2021
Messages
305
Reaction score
258
Points
63
AK is doing alright. The WR are having trouble separating on the deep balls. Maybe need a little more speed. I’d like to see Taylor on deep routes sometimes. Also would like to 20 yard crossing patterns.
 


TurfGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 21, 2016
Messages
619
Reaction score
597
Points
93
My heart pains to see the Mitch Leidner and Athan Kaliakmakis comparisons. I wish Athan had Mitch's ability to QB sneak into the end zone at will (minus that one MI game.) Other than that Athan is far superior, Mitch couldnt throw at all. I think he will be as good as Adam Weber.
 




Top Bottom