TonyLiebert
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
- Messages
- 577
- Reaction score
- 1,170
- Points
- 93
My guess is a 13-6 type of game.I think 32.5 is too high.
Really - no joke.
I will be surprised if the 2 teams combine for 30 points.
If we get up more than 10 we should strongly consider punting on third down if it’s 3rd and more than 8If we get up by more than 10 we won't throw the ball the rest of the game.
If we get up by 10 or more we should take 3 knees, bleeding the playclock all the way down on each snap, and then punt.If we get up more than 10 we should strongly consider punting on third down if it’s 3rd and more than 8
Iowa has multiple blocked punts this year so it may make sense to just take a knee on 4th down too.If we get up more than 10 we should strongly consider punting on third down if it’s 3rd and more than 8
Its crazy that what I'm most worried about on a team is their special teams. They can very easily win this game for them. Our special Teams in on the edge of decent at best... Will be interesting to see if we can pin them downfield during any point in the game.Iowa has multiple blocked punts this year so it may make sense to just take a knee on 4th down too.
I'm joking....sort of.
Field goals kept us in the Nebraska game.Its crazy that what I'm most worried about on a team is their special teams. They can very easily win this game for them. Our special Teams in on the edge of decent at best... Will be interesting to see if we can pin them downfield during any point in the game.
Yes, it seems like the type of game where both coaches would defer if they win the toss, try to get a quick three and out and then play field position the rest of the first half until they get a score. Turnovers and situational punting will rule the day.Its crazy that what I'm most worried about on a team is their special teams. They can very easily win this game for them. Our special Teams in on the edge of decent at best... Will be interesting to see if we can pin them downfield during any point in the game.
Yeah. I didn’t mean punt formation. I meant athan punt it from the gunIowa has multiple blocked punts this year so it may make sense to just take a knee on 4th down too.
I'm joking....sort of.
I think our special teams being bad in 2020 and early 2021 have caused people to think they’re still bad.Field goals kept us in the Nebraska game.
Yeah Trickett has been excellent this year outside of Purdue, when I refer to our special teams being decent at best I'm mostly talking about punting. Dead last in the B1G ten in longest punt and second to last in average distance. The key playing Iowa will be making them drive long distances. Crawford needs to step up and play well. I think he did great against Rutgers If I remember correctly.Field goals kept us in the Nebraska game.
You mean 3?If we get up by more than 10 we won't throw the ball the rest of the game.
There is zero doubt they have the better punter but one positive with Crawford's shorter punts is that they rarely lead to any sort of return. Our net punting average is 37.9 yards and Iowa's is 41.A lot of posters on GH like to joke about whether TM2 can throw a pass over 40 yards (spoiler: he can). The more pertinent question to me is whether Crawford can punt consistently over 40 yards. He is pretty good at pinning teams well inside the 20 when a long punt isn’t needed (and that is much appreciated), but when a long punt could “flip the field,” he often seems not to have the length. Reminds me of Leroy Hoard: “If you need one yard I’ll get you two; if you need three yards, I’ll get you two.” Iowa’s punter often flips the field. That is a part of why their D is so effective.
Agree on both points.There is zero doubt they have the better punter but one positive with Crawford's shorter punts is that they rarely lead to any sort of return. Our net punting average is 37.9 yards and Iowa's is 41.
We have a definite advantage on kickoffs. 84% of Kesich's kicks end up as touchbacks whereas only 60% of the Iowa kickers do.
A lot of posters on GH like to joke about whether TM2 can throw a pass over 40 yards (spoiler: he can). The more pertinent question to me is whether Crawford can punt consistently over 40 yards. He is pretty good at pinning teams well inside the 20 when a long punt isn’t needed (and that is much appreciated), but when a long punt could “flip the field,” he often seems not to have the length. Reminds me of Leroy Hoard: “If you need one yard I’ll get you two; if you need three yards, I’ll get you two.” Iowa’s punter often flips the field. That is a part of why their D is so effective.
The difference in our STs is essentially one thing: Iowa’s punter often flips the field—which is complementary football in PJ lingo. When we punt from deeper in our own territory we don’t flip the field.As I remember it, the Leroy Hoard quote was:
"If you need 2 yards, I'll get you 3. If you need 5 yards, I'll get you 3."
but I agree with your overall point. with the Gophers special teams, my assessment is
Place-Kicking - solid.
Punting - below average
KO Return - minimal impact
Punt Return - minimal impact
In 10 Games, Redding has 13 KO returns for a 23.8 average, and 11 Punt Ret for a 6.8 avg.
FWIW: Iowa has 17 KO returns for 22.4 avg - and 24 Punt Returns for a 9.8 avg.
The first team with 2 kickoffs wins.There is zero doubt they have the better punter but one positive with Crawford's shorter punts is that they rarely lead to any sort of return. Our net punting average is 37.9 yards and Iowa's is 41.
We have a definite advantage on kickoffs. 84% of Kesich's kicks end up as touchbacks whereas only 60% of the Iowa kickers do.
bold prediction. I'll take the over on just 1 score winning this game.The first team with 2 kickoffs wins.
You just described Fleck’s offense.If we get up by 10 or more we should take 3 knees, bleeding the playclock all the way down on each snap, and then punt.