BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 60,868
- Reaction score
- 16,413
- Points
- 113
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Go Gophers!!
Go Gophers!!
Well, I am sorry but no extra bonus for WINNING the national championship? Just being there is good enough? This is not ELITE! Same old losing attitude at Minnesota.
Just kidding. Although it is odd that they don't specify winning. Also the bonuses for II a and II b are way too low. If Felck* gets the Gophers in the National Championship game, he deserves a couple of million.
Just carrying on the Gopherhole tradition of misspelling names.
Big champion should be around 500,000 and Natty 10,000,000.
I was thinking the same thing - I actually thought they were a little low.
Plus they should specify that if he wins 5 B1G Championships or 3 Rose Bowls or 1 Natty or punches out the Head Football Coach at Wisconsin at mid-field after they go for 2 with a large lead that the U will build a statue of Fleck in front of TCF Bank Stadium!
I would have a lot more respect for Brew had he punched Bielema at mid-field in 2010. Granted, it probably would have gotten him fired on the spot (as opposed to the following week), but can you imagine? He would still be a legend around here!
Well, I am sorry but no extra bonus for WINNING the national championship? Just being there is good enough? This is not ELITE! Same old losing attitude at Minnesota.
Just kidding. Although it is odd that they don't specify winning. Also the bonuses for II a and II b are way too low. If Felck* gets the Gophers in the National Championship game, he deserves a couple of million.
Just carrying on the Gopherhole tradition of misspelling names.
I thought he would get a big bonus if he somehow got to 6 wins this year?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Only 900k maximum possible for a perfect season?
A couple of notes on Fleck's contract - courtesy of an article in the Strib. 1st:
The first page of Fleck’s contract features some new language for Gophers deals: The first official duty of a coach in regard to his players now reads Fleck must make an “effort to develop their character.”
Questions - how do they determine whether the coach "made an effort to develop character," and how do they determine whether that effort was successful? What is the character-developing yardstick?
Next, can we guess the genesis of this provision:
A new clause was added to the list of reasons the university can fire a football coach with cause: “Coach’s refusal to obey and/or carry out any reasonable assignment or directive from the [athletic] director …”
Who decides what constitutes a "reasonable" assignment or directive - the AD? The Prexy? (The EOAA....?) Bottom line- the AD is making it plain to the Coach who the boss is.
A couple of notes on Fleck's contract - courtesy of an article in the Strib. 1st:
The first page of Fleck’s contract features some new language for Gophers deals: The first official duty of a coach in regard to his players now reads Fleck must make an “effort to develop their character.”
Questions - how do they determine whether the coach "made an effort to develop character," and how do they determine whether that effort was successful? What is the character-developing yardstick?
Next, can we guess the genesis of this provision:
A new clause was added to the list of reasons the university can fire a football coach with cause: “Coach’s refusal to obey and/or carry out any reasonable assignment or directive from the [athletic] director …”
Who decides what constitutes a "reasonable" assignment or directive - the AD? The Prexy? (The EOAA....?) Bottom line- the AD is making it plain to the Coach who the boss is.
A couple of notes on Fleck's contract - courtesy of an article in the Strib. 1st:
The first page of Fleck’s contract features some new language for Gophers deals: The first official duty of a coach in regard to his players now reads Fleck must make an “effort to develop their character.”
Questions - how do they determine whether the coach "made an effort to develop character," and how do they determine whether that effort was successful? What is the character-developing yardstick?
Next, can we guess the genesis of this provision:
A new clause was added to the list of reasons the university can fire a football coach with cause: “Coach’s refusal to obey and/or carry out any reasonable assignment or directive from the [athletic] director …”
Who decides what constitutes a "reasonable" assignment or directive - the AD? The Prexy? (The EOAA....?) Bottom line- the AD is making it plain to the Coach who the boss is.
A couple of notes on Fleck's contract - courtesy of an article in the Strib. 1st:
The first page of Fleck’s contract features some new language for Gophers deals: The first official duty of a coach in regard to his players now reads Fleck must make an “effort to develop their character.”
Questions - how do they determine whether the coach "made an effort to develop character," and how do they determine whether that effort was successful? What is the character-developing yardstick?
Next, can we guess the genesis of this provision:
A new clause was added to the list of reasons the university can fire a football coach with cause: “Coach’s refusal to obey and/or carry out any reasonable assignment or directive from the [athletic] director …”
Who decides what constitutes a "reasonable" assignment or directive - the AD? The Prexy? (The EOAA....?) Bottom line- the AD is making it plain to the Coach who the boss is.